Don’t apologize for vague accusations of “harm.” It’s not a fair fight. They don’t want dialogue.
Yes!
Expose their inconsistencies - show how their demands won’t achieve what they claim to care about (helping the poor, etc).
NO NO NO, they'll always have the advantage, they live and THRIVE in inconsistencies.
You can't play against people that ignore all rules (even if they favor them) and would rather scream oppression and get you cancelled.
It’ll require some reading and a lot of courage.
They'll just quote a heavily biased, non peer-reviewed paper written by 3 grad students during a summer retreat as "fact" and what you gonna do?
What we have to do is "redpill" people one at a time, even if I hate this term*.
Slowly, plant the doubt in their mind but don't try to instantly convert them, the subconscious mind has strong defenses against abrupt changes of moral values.
You can't awaken them, instead you can help them awaken themselves.
It also helps a lot if you get them to stop consuming compromised media (anything to do with hollywood, california, big tech, the CCP, etc...)
NO NO NO, they'll always have the advantage, they live and THRIVE in inconsistencies.
Sort of. For normies, an inconsistency within the Leftist mindset is certainly useful: "How can you say that people can change gender but not race? How is biological sex a social construct, but race is unchangeable?"
It's more important to point out the fact that their inconsistency is simply the result of them making arguments from power. It's a bad idea for us to get caught up in their hypocrisy, but it's not a bad idea to point out that their hypocrisy exists because they only want power and refuse to stand on principles.
I hate the term because online there's this belief that you can give the redpill to someone and then BAM! he's redpilled.
It works a lot more if you let them see the cracks, the glitches in the matrix, all the little things that our glorious censors unintentionally let slip past them.
Yes!
NO NO NO, they'll always have the advantage, they live and THRIVE in inconsistencies. You can't play against people that ignore all rules (even if they favor them) and would rather scream oppression and get you cancelled.
They'll just quote a heavily biased, non peer-reviewed paper written by 3 grad students during a summer retreat as "fact" and what you gonna do?
What we have to do is "redpill" people one at a time, even if I hate this term*.
Slowly, plant the doubt in their mind but don't try to instantly convert them, the subconscious mind has strong defenses against abrupt changes of moral values.
You can't awaken them, instead you can help them awaken themselves.
It also helps a lot if you get them to stop consuming compromised media (anything to do with hollywood, california, big tech, the CCP, etc...)
Sort of. For normies, an inconsistency within the Leftist mindset is certainly useful: "How can you say that people can change gender but not race? How is biological sex a social construct, but race is unchangeable?"
It's more important to point out the fact that their inconsistency is simply the result of them making arguments from power. It's a bad idea for us to get caught up in their hypocrisy, but it's not a bad idea to point out that their hypocrisy exists because they only want power and refuse to stand on principles.
*
I hate the term because online there's this belief that you can give the redpill to someone and then BAM! he's redpilled.
It works a lot more if you let them see the cracks, the glitches in the matrix, all the little things that our glorious censors unintentionally let slip past them.