If Global Warming was as imminent and inevitable a threat as they pose it to be...
It can be solved with just four of the USA's largest bombs. All global warming, solved for centuries if not longer.
"But that's barbaric!"
Yes. But the fearmongering is saying WE'RE ALL DEAD, 100%, DOOMED, BY 2050!
If we are, indeed, doomed, then ANY act that solves it is a reasonable act to take. An act that has a 100% chance of solving the problem, and takes less than a day to implement, would be used immediately.
The fact that China isn't a sheet of obsidian glass proves that global warming isn't exactly a world-ending threat. And anyone who thinks it is, should be out there with placards, saying "nukes for nature, Mother MOAB for Mother Gaia".
I don't think such an action is necessary, because I don't think the global warming crisis is as world-ending as they'd have me believe. But if I did believe it, logically and ethically I'd have no choice but to endorse nuclear war.
If Global Warming was as imminent and inevitable a threat as they pose it to be...
It can be solved with just four of the USA's largest bombs. All global warming, solved for centuries if not longer.
"But that's barbaric!"
Yes. But the fearmongering is saying WE'RE ALL DEAD, 100%, DOOMED, BY 2050!
If we are, indeed, doomed, then ANY act that solves it is a reasonable act to take. An act that has a 100% chance of solving the problem, and takes less than a day to implement, would be used immediately.
The fact that China isn't a sheet of obsidian glass proves that global warming isn't exactly a world-ending threat. And anyone who thinks it is, should be out there with placards, saying "nukes for nature, Mother MOAB for Mother Gaia".
I don't think such an action is necessary, because I don't think the global warming crisis is as world-ending as they'd have me believe. But if I did believe it, logically and ethically I'd have no choice but to endorse nuclear war.
Holy shit. Don't give em any ideas, theyd probably choose Veinna and Moscow and Rome first.