Ah, the United Femdom. Can't seem to escape stories from there, they always end up on Men's Rights pages.
So, we have a woman who wanted a daughter and therefore abuses the child, leaving dangerous situations for him to get into in the hope he would die, including open bottles of bleach and ladders out of windows.
We have social workers saying it's the worst thing they've seen, cataloguing 80 bruises on him.
We have a defendant that feels zero remorse as well as tried to shift the blame to the nearest man. (how surprising...)
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
Judge Penelope Belcher said she was imposing a non-custodial sentence so the defendant can work with the probation service and receive support for her personality disorder.
If this was a man abusing a child, he'd get far more.
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
But it's not, so it doesn't matter.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
There's absolutely nothing to substantiate it. You made this up based on your delusions that the wimmenz are after you and trying to kill you and all other men.
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
What is your evidence that the sentence would be any different if the judge had not been female?
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
Prove it.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
Right here. You're full of shit, as usual. Speaking of which, have "they" managed to kill you yet with that "virus created by women to kill men", and with that "vaccine created by women to kill men"? You said they'd switch out the Pfizer vaccine for the AZ vaccine to kill you.
You may be downvoted, but you're right. Let's not fall into the same trap of victimhood and moral indignation that our old enemies do, however easy it may be.
Ah, the United Femdom. Can't seem to escape stories from there, they always end up on Men's Rights pages.
So, we have a woman who wanted a daughter and therefore abuses the child, leaving dangerous situations for him to get into in the hope he would die, including open bottles of bleach and ladders out of windows.
We have social workers saying it's the worst thing they've seen, cataloguing 80 bruises on him.
We have a defendant that feels zero remorse as well as tried to shift the blame to the nearest man. (how surprising...)
But then we have a female judge, who sees that it's one of the in-group harming the out-group and therefore means nothing.
If this was a man abusing a child, he'd get far more.
If this was someone of either gender abusing a girl, they'd get far more.
But it's not, so it doesn't matter.
Where are the staunch woman defenders to explain this one?
There's absolutely nothing to substantiate it. You made this up based on your delusions that the wimmenz are after you and trying to kill you and all other men.
What is your evidence that the sentence would be any different if the judge had not been female?
Prove it.
Right here. You're full of shit, as usual. Speaking of which, have "they" managed to kill you yet with that "virus created by women to kill men", and with that "vaccine created by women to kill men"? You said they'd switch out the Pfizer vaccine for the AZ vaccine to kill you.
You may be downvoted, but you're right. Let's not fall into the same trap of victimhood and moral indignation that our old enemies do, however easy it may be.