Again, if you never ever, ever want a child, why wouldn't you get an abortion at the first sign of one?
Can men abort a child? What a ridiculous non-sequitur.
I'm not, I fully believe it was because the female judge wanted to let the woman off. Usually they at least spend a few months behind bars.
It was insane to believe in vaccine passports last year.
Fully agree. Despite the fact that I believe Pfizer is safe and even have an investment in Pfizer, I won't be getting the shot. I just don't trust the authorities to make the right decision after fucking up twice already. (AZ safe, J&J safe)
Again, if you never ever, ever want a child, why wouldn't you get an abortion at the first sign of one?
Again with this ridiculous argument from ignorance, which has already been addressed in a previous comment.
Can men abort a child? What a ridiculous non-sequitur.
It's not a non-sequitur. If you assume that a woman abusing a boy hates men, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I fully believe it was because the female judge wanted to let the woman off
Alright, so male judges don't go easy on female offenders. I'll make sure to remind you of that whenever you start whining about some other case where there is a male judge.
It was insane to believe in vaccine passports last year.
Not really. It was to be expected. But let's assume this arguendo. So that means that every one of your loony beliefs is not loony?
Fully agree. Despite the fact that I believe Pfizer is safe and even have an investment in Pfizer, I won't be getting the shot. I just don't trust the authorities to make the right decision after fucking up twice already. (AZ safe, J&J safe)
I am less worried about known side-effects, than about unknown side-effects. The rate of side-effects for both AZ and J&J is infinitesimal compared to toe good that vaccination does - at least for some groups. Authorities most certainly don't know about those, and yet they assert that these vaccines - all of them - are 'safe'. There certainly are higher-risk groups where you would take the risk of the unknown over the risk of the known, but that is not a great idea for young and healthy people.
Again, if you never ever, ever want a child, why wouldn't you get an abortion at the first sign of one?
Can men abort a child? What a ridiculous non-sequitur.
I'm not, I fully believe it was because the female judge wanted to let the woman off. Usually they at least spend a few months behind bars.
It was insane to believe in vaccine passports last year.
Fully agree. Despite the fact that I believe Pfizer is safe and even have an investment in Pfizer, I won't be getting the shot. I just don't trust the authorities to make the right decision after fucking up twice already. (AZ safe, J&J safe)
Again with this ridiculous argument from ignorance, which has already been addressed in a previous comment.
It's not a non-sequitur. If you assume that a woman abusing a boy hates men, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Alright, so male judges don't go easy on female offenders. I'll make sure to remind you of that whenever you start whining about some other case where there is a male judge.
Not really. It was to be expected. But let's assume this arguendo. So that means that every one of your loony beliefs is not loony?
I am less worried about known side-effects, than about unknown side-effects. The rate of side-effects for both AZ and J&J is infinitesimal compared to toe good that vaccination does - at least for some groups. Authorities most certainly don't know about those, and yet they assert that these vaccines - all of them - are 'safe'. There certainly are higher-risk groups where you would take the risk of the unknown over the risk of the known, but that is not a great idea for young and healthy people.