It's good that he rejects Critical Theory, but he has a long way to go.

I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin.

Race is not simply skin color, it's far more than that. Race, or rather genetics, is a significant factor on how people think. Different races have different preferences and standards, that leads to different cultures.

By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died.

The "racial equality" movement was always going to end like this. At best it's a racial ceasefire for a period of time. However it was mostly a movement to get average white people to stop thinking as a group and accept "diversity" instead at their expense.

l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests.

Plenty of second-hand victimhood there, would you care to call it anti-white? It's not bad to care about the well being of your family and people like you. It doesn't always need to be done through proxy of "helping everybody" to justify it.

The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education.

Wrong, the number one priority has been indoctrination. Especially since the 1960's and onwards. This applies to the news as well, which is education for the adults.