Note that this is one of the questions that far-left academics use to brand anyone who disagrees with their cult of racial myths as guilty of 'racial resentment'. Wanting to treat blacks the same as every other group is obvious evidence of 'racial resentment' if you are to the left of Pol Pot.
As for the numbers. Obviously, as there was fluctuation between these groups, there is no way to figure out what the people who were in the left groups were saying 10 years later. However, it does seem that the old adage about atheism is correct. If you don't believe in anything, you (are more likely to) fall for anything.
Note that atheists and agnostics are more likely that black Protestants to say that blacks should be given more privileges.
Hindus and Buddhists are a very interesting case. It seems that they are the only demographic that became more based, not less.
Jews are less liberal than I expected, but that is probably because the quiet 'Orthodox' types (who are also more likely to be attacked by people who happen to be BBBlack) are included in this survey, when we generally do not hear much about them.
Long story short, America seems to be completely screwed. Good luck. I'm glad you guy have a Second Amendment so you can at least defend yourselves.
Also true. But at least it's something that has 'worked' for 2000 years, in that it was not incompatible with Western civilization. Without it, you get things like communism, Nazism and BLM.
If you believe in anything, you (most likely) fell for something.
Probably true unless you've derived your system or morals and ethics from first principles (and even then you've fallen for the idea that doing so is possible and desirable).
Note that this is one of the questions that far-left academics use to brand anyone who disagrees with their cult of racial myths as guilty of 'racial resentment'. Wanting to treat blacks the same as every other group is obvious evidence of 'racial resentment' if you are to the left of Pol Pot.
As for the numbers. Obviously, as there was fluctuation between these groups, there is no way to figure out what the people who were in the left groups were saying 10 years later. However, it does seem that the old adage about atheism is correct. If you don't believe in anything, you (are more likely to) fall for anything.
Note that atheists and agnostics are more likely that black Protestants to say that blacks should be given more privileges.
Hindus and Buddhists are a very interesting case. It seems that they are the only demographic that became more based, not less.
Jews are less liberal than I expected, but that is probably because the quiet 'Orthodox' types (who are also more likely to be attacked by people who happen to be BBBlack) are included in this survey, when we generally do not hear much about them.
Long story short, America seems to be completely screwed. Good luck. I'm glad you guy have a Second Amendment so you can at least defend yourselves.
You're right, it's just the Hindus who got more based.
Considering the numbers of Hindus, it might just be statistical noise.
If that is the case, then every group got dumber over the past 10 years.
About 1 in 10.
How do you feel about this one:
Also true. But at least it's something that has 'worked' for 2000 years, in that it was not incompatible with Western civilization. Without it, you get things like communism, Nazism and BLM.
Probably true unless you've derived your system or morals and ethics from first principles (and even then you've fallen for the idea that doing so is possible and desirable).