But we already know Tim likes to flipflop. He does it because he doesn't think like us. You guys should be happy he's now a full 2A advocate because that's the only "hardline" stance I've seen him take.
IMC on the other hand, just flip flops when it's beneficial to his personal brand.
I'd rather have someone like Tim who I know will take that "milquetoast" stance and not move from it than IMC who would switch sides once the cancel crowd goes after him.
Make no mistake, Tim sees where his market is. If Tim thought he could make more money serving a different market, he would.
And the day may come fairly soon where he actually will make more money by switching sides, and I will be proven right. Hopefully some of you begin to learn from betrayals, but I have very little hope in that regard. People seem willing to take anyone back after betrayals.
Nobody seems to be smart enough to understand that if you take someone back after a betrayal, you are just going to get betrayed all the time. Because there is always great incentive from the other side to betray people. So unless there is a great dis-incentive to betray (meaning unless you go scorched earth and destroy them for betraying you), they will betray you all the time.
Think of it like a relationship. If you take a woman (or man if you're a woman) back immediately after they cheat on you with no penalty for the cheating, what do you think will likely happen? Do you think they will then stop cheating on you and become faithful, or cheat on you again at the nearest opportunity?
But we already know Tim likes to flipflop. He does it because he doesn't think like us. You guys should be happy he's now a full 2A advocate because that's the only "hardline" stance I've seen him take.
IMC on the other hand, just flip flops when it's beneficial to his personal brand.
I'd rather have someone like Tim who I know will take that "milquetoast" stance and not move from it than IMC who would switch sides once the cancel crowd goes after him.
Make no mistake, Tim sees where his market is. If Tim thought he could make more money serving a different market, he would.
And the day may come fairly soon where he actually will make more money by switching sides, and I will be proven right. Hopefully some of you begin to learn from betrayals, but I have very little hope in that regard. People seem willing to take anyone back after betrayals.
Nobody seems to be smart enough to understand that if you take someone back after a betrayal, you are just going to get betrayed all the time. Because there is always great incentive from the other side to betray people. So unless there is a great dis-incentive to betray (meaning unless you go scorched earth and destroy them for betraying you), they will betray you all the time.
Think of it like a relationship. If you take a woman (or man if you're a woman) back immediately after they cheat on you with no penalty for the cheating, what do you think will likely happen? Do you think they will then stop cheating on you and become faithful, or cheat on you again at the nearest opportunity?
Which is why you don't trust a traitor either. Let them betray their side for yours; reward them with death or imprisonment.