Goolag buying her IPO = payment for the vaccine's damage to us.
But you also said that only people who don't trust "them" would take the vacicne. So, you think, the feminist men at Google are paying AZ to do damage to other feminist men who trust "them"?
The one where I said that it's most likely made with malicious intent.
And what malicious intent was that? I can guess, but since I don't want to strawman, I'd rather hear what you will make of it now.
If you think we won't be forced to take it one day...
Alright, so you're making a second prediction now. Not only will women be exempted from AZ (even though it was made to harm men, and should do no harm to them), but men will be forced to take specifically that vaccine.
It's fairly obvious. It was made to harm men, that's why all the known fatalities are male.
Why on earth would anyone who wants to 'harm' a group do it by making a vaccine that kills... 1 out of 100,000, what is it? It's like the Israeli 'genocide' that wasn't.
Well, they can just swap the labels. Who can check? You might think you're getting Moderna/Pfizer etc. but you're actually getting that.
They're going to all that trouble, just for a 1/100,000 chance of killing me? Which, if it fails, will protect me against COVID? Why not just administer poison instead? Cut out the middleman.
That's the first I've heard of it. What I kept hearing was that women got non-fatal but painful clots, while men got DVST.
I didn't have any illusions about it changing your mind. If more women were to die, I'm guessing your claim would be "they tried to kill men, but it misfired and killed more of theeeem".
But you also said that only people who don't trust "them" would take the vacicne. So, you think, the feminist men at Google are paying AZ to do damage to other feminist men who trust "them"?
And what malicious intent was that? I can guess, but since I don't want to strawman, I'd rather hear what you will make of it now.
If you think we won't be forced to take it one day...
It's fairly obvious. It was made to harm men, that's why all the known fatalities are male.
Alright, so you're making a second prediction now. Not only will women be exempted from AZ (even though it was made to harm men, and should do no harm to them), but men will be forced to take specifically that vaccine.
https://www.euroweeklynews.com/2021/03/19/another-40-year-old-woman-dies-in-spain-after-astrazeneca-vaccination/
https://nltimes.nl/2021/04/02/woman-dies-lung-embolism-astrazeneca-vaccine
https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/63-year-old-greek-woman-dies-after-taking-astrazeneca-vaccine/
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/woman-who-died-after-astrazeneca-shot-had-highly-unusual-symptoms-officials-say-1.5348919
Well, they can just swap the labels. Who can check? You might think you're getting Moderna/Pfizer etc. but you're actually getting that.
That's the first I've heard of it. What I kept hearing was that women got non-fatal but painful clots, while men got DVST.
They're going to all that trouble, just for a 1/100,000 chance of killing me? Which, if it fails, will protect me against COVID? Why not just administer poison instead? Cut out the middleman.
I didn't have any illusions about it changing your mind. If more women were to die, I'm guessing your claim would be "they tried to kill men, but it misfired and killed more of theeeem".