Then stop reminding me of them. The similarities are interesting.
I don't see anything wrong with what I said there. It's not like I advocated for any actual harm.
It's sadistic, and you definitely did advocate for actual harm. I'm sure you'd cry outrage if GC wanted you to "lose their real job" for posting your opinions. Or if someone outed the sons of Kara Swisher for listening to Ben Shapiro so she could abuse them, as she did.
It talks about why the sellers are absolutely terrible people beyond any doubt and that the whole concept of OnlyFans is about the superiority of women over men.
If 4chan says it, it must be true. Not everything is about 'superiority' of one gender to another. You could argue it either way, or you can argue it neither way.
No, but if you're so damaged that you think paying a woman directly for pictures is right, you are clearly not all there.
Why is it any more or less right than paying for nude pictures indirectly? And what of the women who put their nude asses online for money? They seem far more damaged.
I was talking about US elections. But as you asked, Macron banned AstraZeneca, so he would have my support.
So US elections can't change a thing, but other elections can? Pretty sure that Marine is more woke on AZ than Macron.
Not really. It's logical given that my strategy is to take the low road like the opposition, there will be times when we use the same tactics.
Not at all. Some of these people are in positions where their sick ideology could do harm. I don't have a job where I can do anything to harm women.
Why is it any more or less right than paying for nude pictures indirectly?
Paying the person directly is an act of servitude to their superiority, while paying a third party is not.
And what of the women who put their nude asses online for money?
What of them? I hope they lose it all and end up on the street. Taking advantage of people that they brainwashed is the most sickening thing the feminist cult has come up with yet.
US elections seem openly rigged at this point. Maybe other countries aren't.
Not really. It's logical given that my strategy is to take the low road like the opposition, there will be times when we use the same tactics.
I don't know what your strategy is. You claim women are inherently bad, but since they are 51%, you can't outvote them. You say their right to vote should be taken away, but how exactly are you going to accomplish that when they make up a majority and are, in your mind, pure evil?
Not at all. Some of these people are in positions where their sick ideology could do harm. I don't have a job where I can do anything to harm women.
Oh, the old 'racism is prejudice plus power'.
You don't need to be in a 'job' to harm them. You advocate for stuff that you admit will lead to people losing their jobs and being disowned by their families.
Paying the person directly is an act of servitude to their superiority, while paying a third party is not.
Really? If I were in their position, I'd rather be paid through a third party. I would find it quite demeaning to perform jobs for people in return for money.
What of them? I hope they lose it all and end up on the street. Taking advantage of people that they brainwashed is the most sickening thing the feminist cult has come up with yet.
They are the brainwashed people. A girl ruining her own life because she was told that having an OF is oh so empowering, while making $10/month, is not the one taking advantage of anyone. She's a chump, a dupe. But I know why you don't like her.
US elections seem openly rigged at this point. Maybe other countries aren't.
Well, maybe Marine Le Pen will rig the election. The SISTERHOOD.
My strategy is to turn as many people as possible against them. If the trans cult kicks them down the hierarchy, that makes them easier to defeat. If the black community finally realizes they're only in it for themselves, that makes them easier to defeat. Feminism has to be defeated while the elderly are still alive to stop us being overwhelmed in votes, or we'll be in an even worse dystopia than the current one.
It's called the consequences of their actions, something women rarely face.
You're not a woman, so you don't see it through their lens. You have to put yourself in their shoes and think the kind of superiority complex bullshit that they do. They don't consider themselves degraded, they consider you as the loser that has to pay your superior for a glimpse of her divine body.
That's $11 a month more than they deserve. Refer back to what I just said.
Possibly, but as both candidates are nearly equally dreadful, would there be any point? Trump made them use everything they had to get rid of a genuine threat to their world. Macron is merely the same plan, but at a slower pace.
Then stop reminding me of them. The similarities are interesting.
It's sadistic, and you definitely did advocate for actual harm. I'm sure you'd cry outrage if GC wanted you to "lose their real job" for posting your opinions. Or if someone outed the sons of Kara Swisher for listening to Ben Shapiro so she could abuse them, as she did.
If 4chan says it, it must be true. Not everything is about 'superiority' of one gender to another. You could argue it either way, or you can argue it neither way.
Why is it any more or less right than paying for nude pictures indirectly? And what of the women who put their nude asses online for money? They seem far more damaged.
So US elections can't change a thing, but other elections can? Pretty sure that Marine is more woke on AZ than Macron.
Not really. It's logical given that my strategy is to take the low road like the opposition, there will be times when we use the same tactics.
Not at all. Some of these people are in positions where their sick ideology could do harm. I don't have a job where I can do anything to harm women.
Paying the person directly is an act of servitude to their superiority, while paying a third party is not.
What of them? I hope they lose it all and end up on the street. Taking advantage of people that they brainwashed is the most sickening thing the feminist cult has come up with yet.
US elections seem openly rigged at this point. Maybe other countries aren't.
I don't know what your strategy is. You claim women are inherently bad, but since they are 51%, you can't outvote them. You say their right to vote should be taken away, but how exactly are you going to accomplish that when they make up a majority and are, in your mind, pure evil?
Oh, the old 'racism is prejudice plus power'.
You don't need to be in a 'job' to harm them. You advocate for stuff that you admit will lead to people losing their jobs and being disowned by their families.
Really? If I were in their position, I'd rather be paid through a third party. I would find it quite demeaning to perform jobs for people in return for money.
They are the brainwashed people. A girl ruining her own life because she was told that having an OF is oh so empowering, while making $10/month, is not the one taking advantage of anyone. She's a chump, a dupe. But I know why you don't like her.
Well, maybe Marine Le Pen will rig the election. The SISTERHOOD.
My strategy is to turn as many people as possible against them. If the trans cult kicks them down the hierarchy, that makes them easier to defeat. If the black community finally realizes they're only in it for themselves, that makes them easier to defeat. Feminism has to be defeated while the elderly are still alive to stop us being overwhelmed in votes, or we'll be in an even worse dystopia than the current one.
It's called the consequences of their actions, something women rarely face.
You're not a woman, so you don't see it through their lens. You have to put yourself in their shoes and think the kind of superiority complex bullshit that they do. They don't consider themselves degraded, they consider you as the loser that has to pay your superior for a glimpse of her divine body.
That's $11 a month more than they deserve. Refer back to what I just said.
Possibly, but as both candidates are nearly equally dreadful, would there be any point? Trump made them use everything they had to get rid of a genuine threat to their world. Macron is merely the same plan, but at a slower pace.