ask someone if they think a woman would lie to get pregnant to milk child support cash.
People know there are crazies out there. I think they will disagree with your claim that LITERALLY EVERY WOMAN is plotting to (1) milk your for cash support and then (2) to carry out The Genocide by killing you.
You think it's 90% of wahmen, people with a brain think it's 1% or so.
So tempting to R16 you for that. Would be kind of hilarious.
Go ahead. I dare you. I assume you are smart enough to know that the fallen nature of man means humanity.
So why on earth would you support a bill that rewards them lying?
This is hardly a reward.
Black women were paid to ditch their partners. They did so enthusiastically and without any care for their community.
ROFL. I want to know if there's a single problem in the world that you won't blame on (some subgroup of) women.
Higher loyalty, you see. They only care about their race when it's a battering ram against white men. Otherwise it's sisterhood uber alles.
No, no one cares about the 'sisterhood'. That's just your delusion, for which you make sure to ignore Rotherham, Munich, and the numerous rapes committed by black men ignored by feminists.
If you forced me to give a figure of women that abuse people's trust, I'd say around 55%, rising to >80% for just those of age to bear children.
I do know that, yes. I was speaking about the woman comment. If I said that, I'd probably be banned again.
Not having to foot the set-up fees for their con seems pretty rewarding.
As you asked...the 2008 financial crash. Although, looking at who approved the disastrous Archegos Capital leverage plan recently, it wouldn't surprise me if a diversity hire caused that too.
The harm against an individual doesn't outweigh the potential harm to men as a group that ignoring those actions allows, through the extra votes.
If you forced me to give a figure of women that abuse people's trust, I'd say around 55%, rising to >80% for just those of age to bear children.
Sounds about right. Maybe more than 90%.
Your mistake is not in believing that women abuse people's trust, but that men aren't at least as bad. And that it's not necessarily... trying to get kids to get your broke ass to pay child support. That is <1%.
I do know that, yes. I was speaking about the woman comment. If I said that, I'd probably be banned again.
If you were pointing out that people in general, including women, are fallen and that they are not to be trusted? Come on man. You wouldn't get banned for that. That's just a comment on human nature. Now if you would say "women cannot be trusted" - then maybe, but that is because you are positing them as untrustwrothy compared to other groups.
Not having to foot the set-up fees for their con seems pretty rewarding.
What con? Jesus Christ.
As you asked...the 2008 financial crash. Although, looking at who approved the disastrous Archegos Capital leverage plan recently, it wouldn't surprise me if a diversity hire caused that too.
Blaming something on a diversity hire is not what I'm talking about. That's fine. The problem is when you say that "this woman diversity hire crashed the economy so that men would lose their jobs and kill themselves, to effect The Genocide". That begins to sound like Stormfag nonsense.
The harm against an individual doesn't outweigh the potential harm to men as a group that ignoring those actions allows, through the extra votes.
Alright, do explain to me what 'harm' was done to you which outweighs the tens of thousands of kids repeatedly raped by Muslims. I'd like to hear that.
Yeah, I don't believe that. I'll stick to my 80%+ on that.
Has anyone trusted women in general and gotten anything good from it?
The child support con.
I mean, it wouldn't be the first time women with power have done something to raise male suicide rates.
You mentioned Rotherham, so I guess I'm talking about the UK here? Jess Phillips getting re-elected. All these places where they turned a blind eye to these crimes, return hardline feminists to Parliament.
Yeah, I don't believe that. I'll stick to my 80%+ on that.
You don't believe my estimate that 90% of women (and men) are untrustworthy?
Who knew you were such a fan of wahmen.
Has anyone trusted women in general and gotten anything good from it?
Has blind trust in men ever yieled good things?
The child support con.
And how are you presupposing that it is a con?
I mean, it wouldn't be the first time women with power have done something to raise male suicide rates.
Buzz off with your "your twansphobia raises muh suicide rates". If you kill yourself, then you are a loser, a moron, and a useless one at that.
You mentioned Rotherham, so I guess I'm talking about the UK here? Jess Phillips getting re-elected. All these places where they turned a blind eye to these crimes, return hardline feminists to Parliament.
And? Please explain how (1) the intention of ignoring these crimes was to do 'greater harm to men' (2) what that harm is.
People know there are crazies out there. I think they will disagree with your claim that LITERALLY EVERY WOMAN is plotting to (1) milk your for cash support and then (2) to carry out The Genocide by killing you.
You think it's 90% of wahmen, people with a brain think it's 1% or so.
Go ahead. I dare you. I assume you are smart enough to know that the fallen nature of man means humanity.
This is hardly a reward.
ROFL. I want to know if there's a single problem in the world that you won't blame on (some subgroup of) women.
No, no one cares about the 'sisterhood'. That's just your delusion, for which you make sure to ignore Rotherham, Munich, and the numerous rapes committed by black men ignored by feminists.
If you forced me to give a figure of women that abuse people's trust, I'd say around 55%, rising to >80% for just those of age to bear children.
I do know that, yes. I was speaking about the woman comment. If I said that, I'd probably be banned again.
Not having to foot the set-up fees for their con seems pretty rewarding.
As you asked...the 2008 financial crash. Although, looking at who approved the disastrous Archegos Capital leverage plan recently, it wouldn't surprise me if a diversity hire caused that too.
The harm against an individual doesn't outweigh the potential harm to men as a group that ignoring those actions allows, through the extra votes.
Sounds about right. Maybe more than 90%.
Your mistake is not in believing that women abuse people's trust, but that men aren't at least as bad. And that it's not necessarily... trying to get kids to get your broke ass to pay child support. That is <1%.
If you were pointing out that people in general, including women, are fallen and that they are not to be trusted? Come on man. You wouldn't get banned for that. That's just a comment on human nature. Now if you would say "women cannot be trusted" - then maybe, but that is because you are positing them as untrustwrothy compared to other groups.
What con? Jesus Christ.
Blaming something on a diversity hire is not what I'm talking about. That's fine. The problem is when you say that "this woman diversity hire crashed the economy so that men would lose their jobs and kill themselves, to effect The Genocide". That begins to sound like Stormfag nonsense.
Alright, do explain to me what 'harm' was done to you which outweighs the tens of thousands of kids repeatedly raped by Muslims. I'd like to hear that.
Yeah, I don't believe that. I'll stick to my 80%+ on that.
Has anyone trusted women in general and gotten anything good from it?
The child support con.
I mean, it wouldn't be the first time women with power have done something to raise male suicide rates.
You mentioned Rotherham, so I guess I'm talking about the UK here? Jess Phillips getting re-elected. All these places where they turned a blind eye to these crimes, return hardline feminists to Parliament.
You don't believe my estimate that 90% of women (and men) are untrustworthy?
Who knew you were such a fan of wahmen.
Has blind trust in men ever yieled good things?
And how are you presupposing that it is a con?
Buzz off with your "your twansphobia raises muh suicide rates". If you kill yourself, then you are a loser, a moron, and a useless one at that.
And? Please explain how (1) the intention of ignoring these crimes was to do 'greater harm to men' (2) what that harm is.