About nine months ago this lifeboat came into existence following massive purges by Reddit admins against non-establishment conforming materials. Those purges never ended, which is why this particular forum has become the overall bastion for KIA2/GG materials.
On the creation of this site we were presented a set of 16 rules which we, the users, were questioned about. Overwhelming we found that the rules were overbearing and redundant.
Many of these rules are redundant, unnecessary, or bad.
The most obvious of which is that there are THREE rules covering NSFW/pornographic material. It was pointed out by myself as well as numerous other users that these were redundant and pointless, and the assumption was that these would be changed as the rules were simply temporary.
It's nine months on.
Those are only the most egregiously obvious.
The reason I make this post today is that our rules are so open-ended and confusing that even our illustrious mods have no idea WTF they mean.
I was personally banned for a day for a rule 15 violation after which u/DomitiusOfMassilia/ admitted he misunderstood what the rule meant. Immediately after I watched him make the same mistake with another. Now, a week after, I notice that the majority of action is taken under rules 2, 15, and 16. Almost all content removals are based on slurs/bad language/insults.
This post is largely upvoted while Dom's statement of removal is largely downvoted. That's just one example. This is becoming far too common. Please do not make the same mistakes that murdered KIA1.
Note that I am not calling out Dom specifically. I think the rules themselves are dogshit tier and must be fixed. I like this community, even if I do think you're a bunch of faggots. And goddamnit u/TheImpossible1 there's no women involved here so kindly fuck off.
Can we please have a serious discussion about our rules and the impacts that they have, and FIX THEM? We do not need SIXTEEN RULES, especially when it's clear not even our mods understand them all.
Fair enough. Ex-voaters aren't so numerous or special that they demand special risk. I think you can agree on some simple terms that reddit treats as slurs, such as "faggot" and "tranny". Not exactly intellectual labels, but they're pretty useful for communicating issues that pop up regularly. The exception you mention about pollution is acceptable to me.
I am eagerly awaiting the inevitable attacks to hit the .win network. So far, I've been pleasantly surprised with their ability to stay online. Just hosting the_donald was a damned big target. Now they're practically challenging the citadel by trying to make their own reddit (I think .win is more threatening than the other places like saidit).
Though that's their issue, a bad actor trying to remove us merely has to convince the .win admins that our presence is a liability and I don't know them personally so who knows how easy that may be. I don't think they've stopped by to lay official mandate? I assume Dom would make a sticky about it if so.
Contradiction? Or implying a total corporate takeover like cyberpunk without lasers.
From watching more niche sites struggle with foreign hosts during attacks, I don't think even america is a useful blame target. If someone wants to break your business partner that has no skin in your game aside from a one-sided contract, it won't take a federal effort to accomplish it. I hope one day we are done with all this cancel culture and deplatforming stuff.
They are useful, and they are also not very risky.
So far, as far as I know, they have been very cool. But that of course is no guarantee for the future. If we do allow more dodgy stuff, like unironic racial slurs, we may indeed become more of a liability.
Racial slurs are risky, precisely because of corporate tyranny. We don't fear that anyone will be prosecuted by the government, but that the corporate tyrants will do what they do best.
I meant the culture - the absolute hysteria about words and any sort of rational speech regarding race. Not the state per se.