Been seeing it a lot lately, wondering if there are any good takedowns of the concept.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
That's not the data I was talking about. I was referring specifically to the treatment of black neighbors by white people vs the treatment of white neighbors by black people.
Also, you're ignoring the fact that the only reason that the wealth "accumulates" in the "white" communities vs. "black" communities homes is that the people who live in them set the fucking value. If your community is shit, properties in it will be worth shit. The only people who can fix the communities are the people who live in them. Even if black people were forced to live in their own communities and denied every single opportunity to move out of them, all they have to do is not turn them into a crime ridden hell hole.
Now if you want to talk about the cycle of poverty and how welfare (from Democrats) has reinforced that, and how incentivizing fatherless homes leads to all kinds of problems, and that none of this is race specific, then sure. We can have that discussion. But the reason black wealth has stagnated isn't because of "white people" or "redlining" or any of that shit.
And if you want to bring up Black Wall Street and how it got destroyed, all I have to say is, well, where's Black Wall Street 2? You're telling me that because a hundred years ago there was a race war between a couple of small towns and the white people won, that black people everywhere in the US have just given up? Because, despite all the data pointing in the opposite direction, black people are just too afraid of white people to try again? Fuck off.
So sorry, but I do not grant a single one of your premises. You're just hand-waving and ignoring the actual problem.