Oh, when they finally drive someone to it, I'm sure there'll be the videos about how terrible it is that even this Nazi \ white person \ man was killed. They might even remember not to grin ear-to-ear while they're doing it.
That said, didn't Vice grant to guy who just executed a Trump supporter an interview or something?
I consistently underestimate how shameless the media will be.
I don't think so. If terrorists were to storm the court-room and kill Chauvin during trial; I think they'll rationalize it. The communists have been pushing the concept of "Communal Self-Defense" for a while, which is a) the definition of lynching, and b) actual Nazi rhetoric.
It would not surprise me of the media said something like "It's inappropriate but understandable. If you don't empathize with the discomfort of Black Liberation, you are a sociopath!"
That said, didn't Vice grant to guy who just executed a Trump supporter an interview or something?
Basically. He came to them, they ran the story, and tried not to praise him. They were just trying to not challenge the narrative he was pushing. They didn't explicitly endorse the murder, though.
I don't think so. If terrorists were to storm the court-room and kill Chauvin during trial; I think they'll rationalize it. The communists have been pushing the concept of "Communal Self-Defense" for a while, which is a) the definition of lynching, and b) actual Nazi rhetoric.
You could well be right. Like I said, I consistently underestimate just how big a bunch of shitbags the media is prepared to be. That said, I suspect that they'd do the omerta thing and just bury the story. As a tactic, it's working well for them so far - they've got enough of a monopoly that aside from a small group of people, if they don't talk about it, it didn't happen.
Vice not explicitly endorsing the murder.
I wonder if that's simply because Michael Reinoehl got himself killed with such alacrity - Danielson was murdered August 29^th, Reinoehl was dead by the 3^rd September - that they just didn't have time to do so.
"Because CNN's public doxxing of a guy just wasn't scummy enough"
This is actually starting to remind me of the Joker movie. The media want something terrible to happen. They want a lynching.
Oh, when they finally drive someone to it, I'm sure there'll be the videos about how terrible it is that even this Nazi \ white person \ man was killed. They might even remember not to grin ear-to-ear while they're doing it.
That said, didn't Vice grant to guy who just executed a Trump supporter an interview or something?
I consistently underestimate how shameless the media will be.
I don't think so. If terrorists were to storm the court-room and kill Chauvin during trial; I think they'll rationalize it. The communists have been pushing the concept of "Communal Self-Defense" for a while, which is a) the definition of lynching, and b) actual Nazi rhetoric.
It would not surprise me of the media said something like "It's inappropriate but understandable. If you don't empathize with the discomfort of Black Liberation, you are a sociopath!"
Basically. He came to them, they ran the story, and tried not to praise him. They were just trying to not challenge the narrative he was pushing. They didn't explicitly endorse the murder, though.
You could well be right. Like I said, I consistently underestimate just how big a bunch of shitbags the media is prepared to be. That said, I suspect that they'd do the omerta thing and just bury the story. As a tactic, it's working well for them so far - they've got enough of a monopoly that aside from a small group of people, if they don't talk about it, it didn't happen.
I wonder if that's simply because Michael Reinoehl got himself killed with such alacrity - Danielson was murdered August 29^th, Reinoehl was dead by the 3^rd September - that they just didn't have time to do so.