I've been hearing a lot more about inflation concerns and how inflation would benefit those with a lot of debt. Of course, that benefit would depend on whether their earnings would match the rate of inflation, which means it would really only benefit those with flexible revenue streams and not those with fixed yearly incomes, so this really only leaves those who have become incredibly wealthy through debt and large businesses.
Democrats are really trying to spend as much money as they can it seems with more and more trillion dollar plans on top of the yearly budget, so it seems increasingly likely that this plan not only tries to appeal to those easily persuaded by freebies, but is also intentionally destroying the economy in the interest of the wealthy elites, which most likely includes many of the politicians currently in office, so that they can pay off the exorbitant amounts of debt that they have used to get that wealth.
It's just astounding how reckless the silent generation/boomers have been in destroying everything their predecessors built. They will never own up to their mistakes and instead would rather take the whole system down to stay afloat for 5 minutes longer than the rest of us.
It's not a person, it's an organization.
Okay, now prove it.
Who owns the wallet?
Who owns the majority of BTC?
Which enterprises are attempting to take control of the crypto market through international legislation and ID trade requirements?
Don't believe me if you don't want to, but don't say you weren't warned.
Crypto is being pushed to replace national currency in the west. When your nation willingly gives up their authority over coin, what does that mean for your national sovereignty?
At this point I think they'll start pushing it hard in normie news before Christmas this year. "We must adapt to the ever changing market. As a result of Covid we have the unprecedented chance to revamp our national economic system."
Biden's handlers already hinted at this.
Who indeed.
If you were right, a take over of the Bitcoin wouldn't have been necessary in 2016-7. Those of us around (and before) watched as globalists invaded the space using Blockstream to re-engineer the development staff (and therefore its modus operandi into the future), their only real avenue of compromising Bitcoin in a way that allowed some actual control. There's no point to all that if they were already pulling the strings from the start and somehow laying in wait as you suggest.
The problem is that their re-engineering didn't work as they expected. Bitcoin + Lightning is technologically a giant hunk of shit that benefits almost entirely from first mover positioning and history of unparalleled asset appreciation that's left speculators rightly moon-eyed. But it's outmoded in a technological sense and won't last as asset kingpin forever. Which is to say that the current significance of Bitcoin has a setting horizon that keeps it relevant only in the short-term. (I'm talking the next 10 years, maybe.)
I mean, sure, the US can issue its own crypto as a "national currency," but they're going to be able to stop people from using and trading in other crypto about as well as they've stopped piracy. Especially with the current DeFi revolution and the massive movement towards information security and veiled privacy for individuals going on. Good luck!