No, it's not my job to research obscure Soviet history about how they treated women during the war, just to be right in Internet arguments. From what was presented in the post, it sounded like the typical female victimhood complex.
Near as makes no difference. The only thing that changes it is marriage, and that's just to make sure the assets they are using don't get requisitioned by the sisterhood.
Please use this same argument for radical Islamists. You'd be accepted on the left with such utter tripe as "you have to wait for the knife in your back before you can act".
I'll read it later. I have to be in a better mood to read it, because it usually ruins my moods.
No, it's not my job to research obscure Soviet history
This is anything but obscure. Rather, this is one of the best-known facts about the Soviet conduct of the war. Yet you spoke in your complete ignorance, as usual.
typical female victimhood complex.
How dare they complain about being gang-raped by 90 soldiers at age 9. That complaining is LITERALLY KILLING you.
Near as makes no difference. The only thing that changes it is marriage, and that's just to make sure the assets they are using don't get requisitioned by the sisterhood.
Sorry, I don't speak Nutjob. Can you translate to English?
Please use this same argument for radical Islamists. You'd be accepted on the left with such utter tripe as "you have to wait for the knife in your back before you can act".
Islamist is an ideology. Yours is more like people who argue that blacks are inherently evil.
I'll read it later. I have to be in a better mood to read it, because it usually ruins my moods.
Sounds strange. If I were in a good mood, I'd not want to ruin it.
Last time I heard about Soviets in the war was in school, obviously they won't talk about that, and I'm not going to take my own time to learn it. I'll just read the article and counter what it says, and to me it sounded like the type of whiny, impossible to prove complaints that women usually make.
Non sequitur (I already said I saw nothing about kids) and that's an obvious exaggeration.
Married women vote right-wing because they don't want their husband's money taken and given to random women.
Feminism is an ideology too.
Well, when I read it in a bad mood, I usually end up getting into arguments with people or saying things that get me banned from places.
I'm not going to take my own time to learn it. I'll just read the article and counter what it says
As I said, you'll just talk about things you have no ide aabout.
Married women vote right-wing because they don't want their husband's money taken and given to random women.
Are you capable of seeing any group as anything but a monolith? You have far more in common with feminists than you do with me.
Feminism is an ideology too.
'Women' is not.
Well, when I read it in a bad mood, I usually end up getting into arguments with people or saying things that get me banned from places.
As bad as your nonsense is, you should not get banned from places. But you do need to be slapped once in a while, because if you're not, you just spiral into ever greater nonsense.
No, it's not my job to research obscure Soviet history about how they treated women during the war, just to be right in Internet arguments. From what was presented in the post, it sounded like the typical female victimhood complex.
Near as makes no difference. The only thing that changes it is marriage, and that's just to make sure the assets they are using don't get requisitioned by the sisterhood.
Please use this same argument for radical Islamists. You'd be accepted on the left with such utter tripe as "you have to wait for the knife in your back before you can act".
I'll read it later. I have to be in a better mood to read it, because it usually ruins my moods.
This is anything but obscure. Rather, this is one of the best-known facts about the Soviet conduct of the war. Yet you spoke in your complete ignorance, as usual.
How dare they complain about being gang-raped by 90 soldiers at age 9. That complaining is LITERALLY KILLING you.
Sorry, I don't speak Nutjob. Can you translate to English?
Islamist is an ideology. Yours is more like people who argue that blacks are inherently evil.
Sounds strange. If I were in a good mood, I'd not want to ruin it.
Last time I heard about Soviets in the war was in school, obviously they won't talk about that, and I'm not going to take my own time to learn it. I'll just read the article and counter what it says, and to me it sounded like the type of whiny, impossible to prove complaints that women usually make.
Non sequitur (I already said I saw nothing about kids) and that's an obvious exaggeration.
Married women vote right-wing because they don't want their husband's money taken and given to random women.
Feminism is an ideology too.
Well, when I read it in a bad mood, I usually end up getting into arguments with people or saying things that get me banned from places.
As I said, you'll just talk about things you have no ide aabout.
Are you capable of seeing any group as anything but a monolith? You have far more in common with feminists than you do with me.
'Women' is not.
As bad as your nonsense is, you should not get banned from places. But you do need to be slapped once in a while, because if you're not, you just spiral into ever greater nonsense.