Well, they literally were Nazis. And no, that article didn't mention children, unless it was after my eyes glazed over from the propaganda.
Well, they do call for violence. Which I've shown, multiple times.
It's not that simple. Not every woman is trying to kill me, but every woman could be. It's the beauty of an ideology based around lying about what you are to everyone. People make the same arguments about Islam and nobody bats an eyelid except for puppet leftists.
You really didn't read the whole thing. It was implied that they were comfortable with ending lives regardless of legality.
Children were raped by the Soviets. Are you now invoking your own historical ignorance? "Your Honor, I saw 'wahmen' and I flew in a rage. I cannot be held responsible for the nonsense that I then posted."
Well, they do call for violence. Which I've shown, multiple times.
"They" are not a monolith.
Not every woman is trying to kill me, but every woman could be.
Someone just discovered this thing called 'free will'. Every man could also be trying to kill you.
It was implied that they were comfortable with ending lives regardless of legality.
Something tells me that it wasn't "implied" at all.
I'm not even going to bother answering this. It's not my job to waste my time learning irrelevant facts about things I'm not interested in. The article posted didn't mention it.
They literally are. Have you not heard of their in-group bias?
The difference being that most men aren't members of an ideology telling them to.
You have the archive. Read it yourself. I've posted it enough times.
It's not my job to waste my time learning irrelevant facts about things I'm not interested in.
It's not your job to know what you are talking about?
Sounds about right.
They literally are. Have you not heard of their in-group bias?
Incredibly dumb. Even with a 'bias', you are not a monolith.
The difference being that most men aren't members of an ideology telling them to.
Neither are most women. And quite the pathetic attempt to divert. If the standard is that something "COULD POTENTIALLY" kill you, you need to be afraid of every man as well, instead of engaging in this pathetic, sad special pleading from the misogynist we know you to be.
You have the archive. Read it yourself. I've posted it enough times.
No, cite it. Or are you lying about this, like you lied so many times before?
I should not have said 'lied', as I think you firmly believe the nonsense that you post. You deceived yourself and then post what you convinced yourself.
For one, when you screamed that the females who had been raped by the Soviets were "Nazis". They were women aged 9 to 70 - the Soviets spared no one.
Fair enough. Yes, you don't call for violence. You just are very good at making yourself appear very odious.
Nice try, but I've heard you claim that it's women in general trying to kill you often enough.
It's called abortion, and there are differences of opinion about whether it's good or bad.
Well, they literally were Nazis. And no, that article didn't mention children, unless it was after my eyes glazed over from the propaganda.
Well, they do call for violence. Which I've shown, multiple times.
It's not that simple. Not every woman is trying to kill me, but every woman could be. It's the beauty of an ideology based around lying about what you are to everyone. People make the same arguments about Islam and nobody bats an eyelid except for puppet leftists.
You really didn't read the whole thing. It was implied that they were comfortable with ending lives regardless of legality.
Children were raped by the Soviets. Are you now invoking your own historical ignorance? "Your Honor, I saw 'wahmen' and I flew in a rage. I cannot be held responsible for the nonsense that I then posted."
"They" are not a monolith.
Someone just discovered this thing called 'free will'. Every man could also be trying to kill you.
Something tells me that it wasn't "implied" at all.
I'm not even going to bother answering this. It's not my job to waste my time learning irrelevant facts about things I'm not interested in. The article posted didn't mention it.
They literally are. Have you not heard of their in-group bias?
The difference being that most men aren't members of an ideology telling them to.
You have the archive. Read it yourself. I've posted it enough times.
It's not your job to know what you are talking about?
Sounds about right.
Incredibly dumb. Even with a 'bias', you are not a monolith.
Neither are most women. And quite the pathetic attempt to divert. If the standard is that something "COULD POTENTIALLY" kill you, you need to be afraid of every man as well, instead of engaging in this pathetic, sad special pleading from the misogynist we know you to be.
No, cite it. Or are you lying about this, like you lied so many times before?
I should not have said 'lied', as I think you firmly believe the nonsense that you post. You deceived yourself and then post what you convinced yourself.