But it isn't real. If a group of people spends their whole time spreading hate for their own benefit, is it really fair to question those who fire it back?
Well, guess what? Women aren't doing that. But you do hate women as a proof, so you are living, walking proof that misogyny is real.
That is the longest nothing answer I've read since the AstraZeneca safety statement. What do you mean? What should I do differently exactly?
Why do states have nuclear weapons, even though their use would result in their own annihilation?
I said something would pass and that they were openly talking about that. I didn't say it would for sure be that
Not only do I remember your scare-mongering about that, but also that you recently said, after of course no such thing happened, that you thought it would.
Criminalising speech against women fits that.
It would be to the detriment of the feminists, ironically enough.
Well, guess what? Women aren't doing that. But you do hate women as a proof, so you are living, walking proof that misogyny is real.
Why do states have nuclear weapons, even though their use would result in their own annihilation?
Not only do I remember your scare-mongering about that, but also that you recently said, after of course no such thing happened, that you thought it would.
It would be to the detriment of the feminists, ironically enough.