No... repeat after me. Data from surveys. Real ones. Unlike the ones you make up, like your claim that "men kill themselves when there is a wahmen as leader." And experiential evidence.
Now, when is the date this 'male curfew' of yours will have been established? Or are you afraid to answer, lest I be proved right as I always am?
Surveys that they complete themselves and therefore aren't worth the paper they were filled in on?
If you've not noticed, these things usually have a catalyst that will lead to them. Guessing a random date is pointless, because until the catalyst that allows them to make it happen has occurred, there's no chance of a change that favors them.
and therefore aren't worth the paper they were filled in on?
As psychotic as it is to say "believe wahmen", it's equally psychotic to say that women can only lie.
If you've not noticed, these things usually have a catalyst that will lead to them. Guessing a random date is pointless, because until the catalyst that allows them to make it happen has occurred, there's no chance of a change that favors them.
I knew you'd pussy out. Earlier, you tried to pussy out by saying that you wouldn't be able to collect your Ferrari. Now, you're unwilling to even specify a date, even though you're absolutely sure that it's coming.
I think deep down you know that you're acting like a lunatic.
Well, psychotic or not, the motive is obvious. Why say you're happy when everyone will break their backs to give you privileges if you're not?
I'm not pussying out. I'm pointing out that giving a date is an impossibility, because it'll happen whenever they have another Everard situation. That could be in a few weeks, or it might not happen for another decade, or maybe even longer than that. Everything they do is opportunistic, relying on either a tipping point in power, or a rallying call of an event.
OK. Why appear happy then? Besides this is among surveys of women. I am pretty sure that if you broke down by feminism vs. normals, the normals would be more happy.
I'm not pussying out. I'm pointing out that giving a date is an impossibility, because it'll happen whenever they have another Everard situation. That could be in a few weeks, or it might not happen for another decade, or maybe even longer than that.
How very convenient. When you were trying to create hysteria over this, you sure as hell were not bothering to mention that it could be "decades away" - by which time, of course, no one can hold you accountable for your "prediction".
No... repeat after me. Data from surveys. Real ones. Unlike the ones you make up, like your claim that "men kill themselves when there is a wahmen as leader." And experiential evidence.
Now, when is the date this 'male curfew' of yours will have been established? Or are you afraid to answer, lest I be proved right as I always am?
Surveys that they complete themselves and therefore aren't worth the paper they were filled in on?
If you've not noticed, these things usually have a catalyst that will lead to them. Guessing a random date is pointless, because until the catalyst that allows them to make it happen has occurred, there's no chance of a change that favors them.
Great insight, that's what a survey is.
As psychotic as it is to say "believe wahmen", it's equally psychotic to say that women can only lie.
I knew you'd pussy out. Earlier, you tried to pussy out by saying that you wouldn't be able to collect your Ferrari. Now, you're unwilling to even specify a date, even though you're absolutely sure that it's coming.
I think deep down you know that you're acting like a lunatic.
Well, psychotic or not, the motive is obvious. Why say you're happy when everyone will break their backs to give you privileges if you're not?
I'm not pussying out. I'm pointing out that giving a date is an impossibility, because it'll happen whenever they have another Everard situation. That could be in a few weeks, or it might not happen for another decade, or maybe even longer than that. Everything they do is opportunistic, relying on either a tipping point in power, or a rallying call of an event.
OK. Why appear happy then? Besides this is among surveys of women. I am pretty sure that if you broke down by feminism vs. normals, the normals would be more happy.
How very convenient. When you were trying to create hysteria over this, you sure as hell were not bothering to mention that it could be "decades away" - by which time, of course, no one can hold you accountable for your "prediction".