Turns out soy really is poison.
(www.rt.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Surprise. FDA recommendation => you sleep. Harvard recommendation => you sleep. Some random woman you had not heard of before recommendation => ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE, THEY'RE TRYING TO KILL US!
Who's 'they'?
You've got it figured out. Wahmen are trying to kill you.
But only when they manage to find an alternative way to open jars.
"If you currently have early-stage breast cancer, don’t eat soy in large amounts"
Can't wait until International Wahmen's Day arrives and you become even more deranged, though I can barely see how that's even possible.
She is the Harvard recommendation. You call me out for reading things wrongly...
You know who. How many things that they've told us to consume actually increase the risk of cancer or other conditions? Once is coincidence, twice is happenstance, three times is enemy action - what's over 10?
I'm sure Bezos of Washington "Why can't we hate all men" Post fame will be able to sell them something.
Nah, just for spinning absolutely everything to satisfy your irrational hatreds, obsessions and rent-free accommodation.
Harvard doesn't have 1 employee, in case you didn't know.
10 times is your delusion. I'm sure that not long from now, you'll be claiming that Wahmen are putting listening devices in your plants, like other paranoids think about the CIA.
You amended it from your previous claim, but you're still lying. Only women with breast cancer are supposed to consume soy in moderation. Not the others.
I assume you don't have breast cancer, but surprise me.
That recommendation was not aimed at men specifically, nutter.
I'm aware of that.
One day I'll actually have the free time to write down all the times they've recommended things that later turned out to be really bad for us.
Right...because Google wouldn't just give their data to feminists if they wanted it.
I couldn't find an online source so I just copied the first link. Obviously I don't have breast cancer, but I have a family member who did, and I still remember them telling her in 2014 that she shouldn't consume soy at all. Of course, anecdotes aren't worth shit, so there's no point in saying it without a link.
Are you going to keep track of a control group, or just indulging in confirmation bias? Because "this is bad for you, no it's good for you, nah it's bad for you after all" is not at all uncommon in this sort of "research".
Pssh... GDPR.
So as I said, it's breast cancer that is a relevant factor? What you are is that image of Philip J. Fry with the caption "how can I be a victim in this?"
I honestly you have a Jekyll and Hyde thing going on. Either you're completely batshit crazy, or completely sensible. No in-between.