Do you fucking see any around here? We're not exactly being over-run by people shouting "shut up goyim!"
And for the shit that gets posted, it's mostly just Leftists that are also Jewish, and then instead of identifying Leftism, you blame Jews. I shouldn't have to point out that Communist China isn't Jewish, but I've had to argue that case several times.
WTF are you talking about? We know there are anti-Zionists Jews.
I don't think you do, because again, I've had to argue that case even more than "Communist China isn't Jewish". Look, Apotheosis doesn't make absolutely asinine claims. He's probably the most articulate of all the white nationalists I've come across. But he's the exception, not the rule. And even he asserts that all Jews are effectively extensions of Satan's influence. I think he's one of those "Chistian Identitiy" guys.
We should be lolberts like you and support open borders, legalized heroine, and abolishing age of consent laws.
Where have you seen me support any of those things. And yeah, I've seen """"""libertarians""""" paid by Koch money to advocate open borders on publications his shell companies run, but those people are as absolutely worthless as "Socialist Libertarians". It's not even worth recognizing or tolerating them. And yeah, you will see me criticize them.
The alt-right has no obvious consensus on China. Some see it as just another gobohomo state controlled by Jews. Others think it could be potential foil to Jews.
Not from what I've dealt with. That's the whole problem with the Judeo-Bolshevism argument. Communism is Jewish because Bolshevism is either Jewish, or a weapon of Jewish power. There is no difference between Globohomo and Judaism. Bolshevism is only seen as an extension of that.
In my experience, that seems to be the prominent position.
Almost no one in the alt-right rants about Communism.
Why would you when Communism is just Judeo-Bolshevist. If there's an argument about Communism, then the alt-right's criticism will slide from Communism directly to Jews.
When alt-righters implicate something as being a Jewish thing, they usually examine financial and personal relationships because these are the things that make the world turn, not whether a party names itself "Communist" or has a hammer and sickle flag.
I never said that they did, in fact, that's my biggest complaint. They keep ignoring that there's an ideological basis to the people their complaining about. If you do get them to recognize ideology: bam! Judeo-Bolshevism. If you point out that it's Leftist: Leftism is Jewish. If you point out that it's feminist: Feminism is Jewish. If you point out that financial entablements are profiting elites: elites are Jewish. If you point out that the elites are not white: then they are working on behalf of Jews.
There is no answer to any question that does not end in Jew. It's all motivated reasoning. It's all playing 6 degrees of separation from any Jew.
Tying China to the Jews has nothing to do with whether Zionist-opposing Jews exists and are acknowledged by the alt-right.
No, but it's a continuation of the obsession with Judeo-Bolshevism.
We're nearly 40 years into major (illegal) immigration concerns, and libertarians can't even figure out whether borders are bad or not.
No, they clearly do. Libertarians just don't have a lot of political organization or control.
The LP candidate in 2020 supported BLM, absolute clown ideology.
I don't know that the "Libertarian Party" even speaks for libertarians at this point.
Yes there is. Judaism is specifically the religion, and many Jews are secular. The secular ones are still a problem (arguably the biggest problem) because they are vehemently anti-white.
Do you fucking see any around here? We're not exactly being over-run by people shouting "shut up goyim!"
And for the shit that gets posted, it's mostly just Leftists that are also Jewish, and then instead of identifying Leftism, you blame Jews. I shouldn't have to point out that Communist China isn't Jewish, but I've had to argue that case several times.
I don't think you do, because again, I've had to argue that case even more than "Communist China isn't Jewish". Look, Apotheosis doesn't make absolutely asinine claims. He's probably the most articulate of all the white nationalists I've come across. But he's the exception, not the rule. And even he asserts that all Jews are effectively extensions of Satan's influence. I think he's one of those "Chistian Identitiy" guys.
Where have you seen me support any of those things. And yeah, I've seen """"""libertarians""""" paid by Koch money to advocate open borders on publications his shell companies run, but those people are as absolutely worthless as "Socialist Libertarians". It's not even worth recognizing or tolerating them. And yeah, you will see me criticize them.
Not from what I've dealt with. That's the whole problem with the Judeo-Bolshevism argument. Communism is Jewish because Bolshevism is either Jewish, or a weapon of Jewish power. There is no difference between Globohomo and Judaism. Bolshevism is only seen as an extension of that.
In my experience, that seems to be the prominent position.
Why would you when Communism is just Judeo-Bolshevist. If there's an argument about Communism, then the alt-right's criticism will slide from Communism directly to Jews.
I never said that they did, in fact, that's my biggest complaint. They keep ignoring that there's an ideological basis to the people their complaining about. If you do get them to recognize ideology: bam! Judeo-Bolshevism. If you point out that it's Leftist: Leftism is Jewish. If you point out that it's feminist: Feminism is Jewish. If you point out that financial entablements are profiting elites: elites are Jewish. If you point out that the elites are not white: then they are working on behalf of Jews.
There is no answer to any question that does not end in Jew. It's all motivated reasoning. It's all playing 6 degrees of separation from any Jew.
No, but it's a continuation of the obsession with Judeo-Bolshevism.
No, they clearly do. Libertarians just don't have a lot of political organization or control.
I don't know that the "Libertarian Party" even speaks for libertarians at this point.
On this, we completely agree.