I mean, the archive literally shows the head mod agreeing with aborting babies for their gender. I don't think you can say sanity prevails there any more than you can say a site ran by me is kind to women.
Considering women are told from the age of five that men are the enemy, it's reasonable to expect that to be their predominant belief. Also, most feminist material including Solanas' manifesto talks about not being honest about what you believe until you have power over the person/thing you're trying to control.
Don't ever compare me to those evil witch wannabes.
Wouldn't you call the situation we are in now a fairly clean win for the left? The opposition has been crippled, their most likely candidate is either a plant or yet another Trump run and they have full control over who wins the elections.
What would you do if they show their true colors and work with the intersectionalists because of mutual hatred of men?
I mean, the archive literally shows the head mod agreeing with aborting babies for their gender. I don't think you can say sanity prevails there any more than you can say a site ran by me is kind to women.
What is your point? I wouldn't say sanity prevails, other than on the tranny issue. Which just so happens to be the greatest threat today...
Considering women are told from the age of five that men are the enemy
They are? What's your proof? And by whom?
Also, most feminist material including Solanas' manifesto talks about not being honest about what you believe until you have power over the person/thing you're trying to control.
You base your views on women in general on the ravings of a mad woman?
Don't ever compare me to those evil witch wannabes.
Not until you stop acting the same way.
Wouldn't you call the situation we are in now a fairly clean win for the left?
No victory is permanent. Unless one side commits suicide.
You apparently want to aid them in entrenching their victory and with she/her Kamala. I'm sorry, I'm not on board with that.
What would you do if they show their true colors and work with the intersectionalists because of mutual hatred of men?
Then they become the enemy. But I'd rather balance them off against the intersectionalists if at all possible.
How are they the greatest threat? They want to get into women's bathrooms - I don't give a single fuck and neither should you. Who even uses public bathrooms? Same for changing rooms and other bullshit. They are the greatest threat to women and that's why TERFs exist - what I don't get is why we should give a fuck.
By teachers, by media, by their entertainment, by their own mothers?
Still taught in women's studies, so not that mad. You know she only claimed insanity so that the shooting couldn't be linked to her manifesto, right? The NOW paid off a psychiatrist and paid her lawyer to make that happen.
I don't.
I don't see how letting one side of hateful women beat another side of hateful women makes any difference. I'd rather cut the amount of hateful women than have both sides exist.
But then you've empowered the enemy. That's what you allied with them to avoid.
I mean, the archive literally shows the head mod agreeing with aborting babies for their gender. I don't think you can say sanity prevails there any more than you can say a site ran by me is kind to women.
Considering women are told from the age of five that men are the enemy, it's reasonable to expect that to be their predominant belief. Also, most feminist material including Solanas' manifesto talks about not being honest about what you believe until you have power over the person/thing you're trying to control.
Don't ever compare me to those evil witch wannabes.
Wouldn't you call the situation we are in now a fairly clean win for the left? The opposition has been crippled, their most likely candidate is either a plant or yet another Trump run and they have full control over who wins the elections.
What would you do if they show their true colors and work with the intersectionalists because of mutual hatred of men?
What is your point? I wouldn't say sanity prevails, other than on the tranny issue. Which just so happens to be the greatest threat today...
They are? What's your proof? And by whom?
You base your views on women in general on the ravings of a mad woman?
Not until you stop acting the same way.
No victory is permanent. Unless one side commits suicide.
You apparently want to aid them in entrenching their victory and with she/her Kamala. I'm sorry, I'm not on board with that.
Then they become the enemy. But I'd rather balance them off against the intersectionalists if at all possible.
How are they the greatest threat? They want to get into women's bathrooms - I don't give a single fuck and neither should you. Who even uses public bathrooms? Same for changing rooms and other bullshit. They are the greatest threat to women and that's why TERFs exist - what I don't get is why we should give a fuck.
By teachers, by media, by their entertainment, by their own mothers?
Still taught in women's studies, so not that mad. You know she only claimed insanity so that the shooting couldn't be linked to her manifesto, right? The NOW paid off a psychiatrist and paid her lawyer to make that happen.
I don't.
I don't see how letting one side of hateful women beat another side of hateful women makes any difference. I'd rather cut the amount of hateful women than have both sides exist.
But then you've empowered the enemy. That's what you allied with them to avoid.