You know, Impossible, I was thinking about you a while back, and it occurred to me that you are just like a woman.
Men often complain that when women complain, they don't want a solution, they want to complain. Indeed, some have speculated to me that you are actually a woman, though I did not believe it.
However, you are like them in that respect. You don't want no stinkin' solutions. You don't want to make stuff better. You just want to whine and complain.
Aww, I'm very flattered that you thought about me. /s.
I do have a solution, and unlike theirs, it isn't a Final Solution. You seem to think that helping our enemies win and gain power is a good thing, but I'm sure that you're aware of the long and storied history of the feminist movement backstabbing every ally they've ever had. That means you too, if you actually help them.
Did you see the second archive posted? GC's head mod agrees with this practice. They deserved more than a ban, they deserved a visit from the cops and investigations of all the male deaths that even remotely were linked to something they did.
God no. I will never, ever be one of them. I will never fucking consider them even neutral, let alone allies.
Edit : Do they think I'm a woman because I "wrong think" about them and must be their plant because of that? That's hilarious, honestly. The idea that anyone who tells the honest truth about what kind of people they are is just trying to bait people into the non-existent "crime" of "misogyny".
What does it say about you if saying what you genuinely are makes people think they're being baited?
You seem to think that helping our enemies win and gain power is a good thing
Excuse me, you are cheering it when intersectionalists censor GC-types. I am trying to make sure that GC-types survive so that we'll be able to use them to balance the greater enemy.
I'm sure that you're aware of the long and storied history of the feminist movement backstabbing every ally they've ever had.
I don't care. They don't need to be trustworthy to be used to balance. They just need to be interested in their own survival. You think I regard your ideology as desirable? No, I find it abhorrent. But I'll still defend your rights, because it's right in principle, and because that is also a protection of my own rights. Same for the GC.
They deserved more than a ban, they deserved a visit from the cops and investigations of all the male deaths that even remotely were linked to something they did.
Pfff... so because they made comments that you don't like, they deserve to be banned for criticizing degenerates.
See, this is why you lose, and you will always lose. It is not your Victimhood status that led to their banning, it's cross-dressers. It does you no good at all.
God no. I will never, ever be one of them. I will never fucking consider them even neutral, let alone allies.
And this is why you will always lose. Because a man will not win without allies. As I said, you just want to throw a tantrum, like a woman, instead of actually doing something productive.
Do they think I'm a woman because I "wrong think" about them and must be their plant because of that?
I am not sure, the reasoning did not seem very persuasive. But in this particular respect, you do act very much like a woman.
What does it say about you if saying what you genuinely are makes people think they're being baited?
That's like saying AIDS is better than cancer. Maybe, but you don't want either.
Quite right. That is because AIDS cannot be balanced against cancer, or vice versa. There is a reason weaker states balance against what is at any point the dominant hegemon. It is because they're being smart. While you are throwing a tantrum, constantly talking about what you don't like.
You are more wedded to saying "me no like" than you are to doing anything productive.
Your mistake is believing that when trans ideology isn't involved, they aren't fighting alongside the intersectionalists just to hurt us for fun.
They are enemies. We can use that. Instead, you cheer when intersectionalists censor GC-types. That is not smart. When there is one big bad bully vs. a bunch of weaker parties, the smart strategy is for all the weaker parties - whatever their disagreements- to take down the big bad bully. That is the position we are in.
Instead, you are cheering the bully as he smashes the other weaklings one after the other, not realizing who is next. Because you don't like the other weaklings. I submit that this is extraordinarily stupid.
I couldn't be more censored than I already am, so...
Oh, I'm sure you could be. And it's not just about you, you know.
You do realize we've already been taken off the board, right? They're just fighting over what ideology will get to raise their flag over a pile of our corpses.
That's like saying AIDS is better than cancer. Maybe, but you don't want either.
Your mistake is believing that when trans ideology isn't involved, they aren't fighting alongside the intersectionalists just to hurt us for fun.
I posted the list on my AskWin post. I'm not typing it again.
I couldn't be more censored than I already am, so...
You know, Impossible, I was thinking about you a while back, and it occurred to me that you are just like a woman.
Men often complain that when women complain, they don't want a solution, they want to complain. Indeed, some have speculated to me that you are actually a woman, though I did not believe it.
However, you are like them in that respect. You don't want no stinkin' solutions. You don't want to make stuff better. You just want to whine and complain.
May we call you an Honorary Woman?
Aww, I'm very flattered that you thought about me. /s.
I do have a solution, and unlike theirs, it isn't a Final Solution. You seem to think that helping our enemies win and gain power is a good thing, but I'm sure that you're aware of the long and storied history of the feminist movement backstabbing every ally they've ever had. That means you too, if you actually help them.
Did you see the second archive posted? GC's head mod agrees with this practice. They deserved more than a ban, they deserved a visit from the cops and investigations of all the male deaths that even remotely were linked to something they did.
God no. I will never, ever be one of them. I will never fucking consider them even neutral, let alone allies.
Edit : Do they think I'm a woman because I "wrong think" about them and must be their plant because of that? That's hilarious, honestly. The idea that anyone who tells the honest truth about what kind of people they are is just trying to bait people into the non-existent "crime" of "misogyny".
What does it say about you if saying what you genuinely are makes people think they're being baited?
Excuse me, you are cheering it when intersectionalists censor GC-types. I am trying to make sure that GC-types survive so that we'll be able to use them to balance the greater enemy.
I don't care. They don't need to be trustworthy to be used to balance. They just need to be interested in their own survival. You think I regard your ideology as desirable? No, I find it abhorrent. But I'll still defend your rights, because it's right in principle, and because that is also a protection of my own rights. Same for the GC.
Pfff... so because they made comments that you don't like, they deserve to be banned for criticizing degenerates.
See, this is why you lose, and you will always lose. It is not your Victimhood status that led to their banning, it's cross-dressers. It does you no good at all.
And this is why you will always lose. Because a man will not win without allies. As I said, you just want to throw a tantrum, like a woman, instead of actually doing something productive.
I am not sure, the reasoning did not seem very persuasive. But in this particular respect, you do act very much like a woman.
I am not sure what and whom you mean here.
Quite right. That is because AIDS cannot be balanced against cancer, or vice versa. There is a reason weaker states balance against what is at any point the dominant hegemon. It is because they're being smart. While you are throwing a tantrum, constantly talking about what you don't like.
You are more wedded to saying "me no like" than you are to doing anything productive.
They are enemies. We can use that. Instead, you cheer when intersectionalists censor GC-types. That is not smart. When there is one big bad bully vs. a bunch of weaker parties, the smart strategy is for all the weaker parties - whatever their disagreements- to take down the big bad bully. That is the position we are in.
Instead, you are cheering the bully as he smashes the other weaklings one after the other, not realizing who is next. Because you don't like the other weaklings. I submit that this is extraordinarily stupid.
Oh, I'm sure you could be. And it's not just about you, you know.
You do realize we've already been taken off the board, right? They're just fighting over what ideology will get to raise their flag over a pile of our corpses.
There is no such thing. We are only off the board when we give up, and I'm not planning on giving up. Not until the last breath is beaten out of me.