Still need data on how many people this is out of, or we're just as guilty of poor statistics than the Covid hystericals.
For instance some countries are pushing for the ballpark of a million vaccinations per day (the US already hit that back in December, for instance) and 40.8k reactions out of 7 million is well below the threshold where you should worry. 55 deaths isn't even a rounding error.
I was gonna say. Where are these numbers coming from? If these numbers are out of low numbers of shots then I understand, but if the adverse reaction numbers are similar to the flu then well, that's typical.
If it's the former, then we got a problem and I'll wait it out and wait for a more safer solution. The Johnson and Johnson one looks way more promising, requires only one dose, has fewer reactions and is also cheap. Still gonna wait that one out too to make sure there's no long term reactions.
The Evergreen Weinsteins are like this about vaccines too - they said in their podcast that are glad this shit is getting out there quickly, but they're not gonna be the first ones to take the mRNA vaccines because the tech is way too new and untested.
Agreed, taking numbers like that, no source, no defi option f what constitutes adverse reaction and not giving how many vaccines were applied just makes us like the other side. Plus, this s the same technique that BLM uses to support their narrative that backs are suffering under the police, that systemic racism exists and that white people are the oppressors. The same bullshit that the ctrl-left uses to push all their narrative, from sexism to the wind turbines were the ones who saved Texas narrative.
Still need data on how many people this is out of, or we're just as guilty of poor statistics than the Covid hystericals.
For instance some countries are pushing for the ballpark of a million vaccinations per day (the US already hit that back in December, for instance) and 40.8k reactions out of 7 million is well below the threshold where you should worry. 55 deaths isn't even a rounding error.
I was gonna say. Where are these numbers coming from? If these numbers are out of low numbers of shots then I understand, but if the adverse reaction numbers are similar to the flu then well, that's typical.
If it's the former, then we got a problem and I'll wait it out and wait for a more safer solution. The Johnson and Johnson one looks way more promising, requires only one dose, has fewer reactions and is also cheap. Still gonna wait that one out too to make sure there's no long term reactions.
The Evergreen Weinsteins are like this about vaccines too - they said in their podcast that are glad this shit is getting out there quickly, but they're not gonna be the first ones to take the mRNA vaccines because the tech is way too new and untested.
Agreed, taking numbers like that, no source, no defi option f what constitutes adverse reaction and not giving how many vaccines were applied just makes us like the other side. Plus, this s the same technique that BLM uses to support their narrative that backs are suffering under the police, that systemic racism exists and that white people are the oppressors. The same bullshit that the ctrl-left uses to push all their narrative, from sexism to the wind turbines were the ones who saved Texas narrative.