I don't totally agree with that. "Knowledge And Decisions" really had an impact on my thinking.
There's a problem with the middle-class. They seem to just accept all """authoritative""" information as gospel, even when it is contradictory.
It comes from a pattern of behavior among the mid-wits that seems to twist contradiction as sophistication. I'll try to explain:
When you first learn something, it can be really confusing at first... but once you understand it, you feel like you understand the deeper meaning of what's going on. In physics, I've seen a ton of this. That's because in physics, you're using more advanced mathematics and whole different ways of thinking about problems all the time than most people are used to. Problems are often very difficult to wrap your head around until you understand the deeper mechanics of what's going on. There's a "Eureka!" moment that lots of people have when trying to solve more and more difficult problems. To be clear, this is a kind of emotional high that you'll have when you discover something.
There are all sorts of little moments like this, like: learning that you can rotate axis to simplify problems, learning how to break problems into component parts, learning how integral & differential calculus is how formulas are invented from their basic mathematical assumptions, understanding that portions of mathematics (like the natural exponent) are discovered rather than invented. All sorts of little things.
However, Leftist psuedo-science doesn't have any of this... so they invent it.
The acceptance of a contradictory statement becomes the Eureka moment for the midwits. They mistake being bamboozled for confusion, and acceptance for learning. The authority figure just signals to them that it's safe to accept the conclusion.
Like this:
SJW: "She has a penis."
Lowwit: "Ha! Good one. Boys have dics, not girls."
Midwit: "Ha ha ha! That's ridiculous".
Highwit: "You've use a contradiction in terms. I'm not taking you seriously."
SJW: Authority: "Actually..."
Lowwit: "???"
Midwit: "???"
Highwit: "Oh god."
SJW: Authority: "... when you define women correctly, of course they can have penii."
Midwit: "Ahhhh... I see."
Highwit: "What? No! You can't just re-define the terms of a premise in an argument!"
Lowwit: "You say that because you like dick, and hide your gay."
SJW: Authority: "Don't listen to them midwit! You're smarter than even highwit now! You are very smart."
Midwit: "Yes! I am very smart."
Highwit: "You're both fucking stupid."
Lowwit: "Midwit tried this on me last week."
Where I think this all comes from is that the 'midwit' grouping is having their life experiences be dictated and controlled by authority figures. They are acting as slaves to an authority which is conditioning them, and giving them experiences through indoctrination, which is contradicting their normal life. The more they ingest corporate media, authority, and propaganda; the more the propaganda defines their lives, rather than their own experiences.
The Lowwits and Highwits are experiencing a different series of events because they are both not ingesting corporatist doctrine. The highwits because they recognize it, and the lowwits because corporatism doesn't benefit them. The lowwits basically live and learn from their experiences for better or worse. If they live in worse conditions, they learn worse lessons. Corporate conditions don't exist for them, and if they do, it's in an adversarial nature. The highwits are capable of recognizing the deception of corporatism, and reject it voluntarily.
What I'm saying is that the normies and midwits need to be stripped of their corporate protectionism, so that they can actually have experiences without the filter of corporate indoctrination and dogma which is supplanting their normal responses to stimuli, and giving them a completely twisted sense of knowledge.
Or, in a more lowwit manner: The boys have to learn.
We have to strip the cathedral at every level. Protectionism is the promise of the authoritarians running it.
So, a good first step is already happening: undermine that protectionist claim.
However, it can't be enough to just undermine it, but to completely subvert and poison the concept. "Look what they will do to you". We must eradicate trust in the institution. It's not enough for them to be skeptical of it, we need to promote the tearing of it apart.
This causes unease in those who are not prepared to protect themselves. So the second step is to push the heroic narrative on each individual to be able to protect themselves. Leadership not only through example, but inspiration as well. We must present them with an affirmative narrative where they can accept and believe that they will be better off governing themselves, then having others govern for them. We must promote a strong sense of individualism and individual attainment. Instead of "Don't raise taxes", say "keep your money". Instead of "cut government spending", say "they can't spend for you." Really push the idea of: only you know best for you.
Now that you have a strong individual, you need a strong community. Each person must be the pillar of their community, over-lapping with one another. New individuals must be able to join a community of people that will offer affiliates, that are anti-parallel to the establishment system.
We must have radical divestment from the establishment system wherever possible. We must exist in anti-parallel to them. We must be pushing the opposite direction.
I can't stress enough that it is imperative to re-individuate people. The establishment supports de-individuation in order to maintain collectivism and propagate emotional abuse & conditioning. Individuation must be a core focus of what we do and the rhetoric we use in order to separate people from the establishment system and make them anti-fragile. They have been given learned helplessness, and we must teach them strength. A heroic narrative is a critical aspect to that.
The only way the COVID restrictions end is when you make them end. Nothing else.
The normies completely fell hook line and sinker for the false narrative based on emotion that the globalists created.
If they didn't wake up in the last fucking ten months, I don't expect them to ever stand up against this.
I don't totally agree with that. "Knowledge And Decisions" really had an impact on my thinking.
There's a problem with the middle-class. They seem to just accept all """authoritative""" information as gospel, even when it is contradictory.
It comes from a pattern of behavior among the mid-wits that seems to twist contradiction as sophistication. I'll try to explain:
When you first learn something, it can be really confusing at first... but once you understand it, you feel like you understand the deeper meaning of what's going on. In physics, I've seen a ton of this. That's because in physics, you're using more advanced mathematics and whole different ways of thinking about problems all the time than most people are used to. Problems are often very difficult to wrap your head around until you understand the deeper mechanics of what's going on. There's a "Eureka!" moment that lots of people have when trying to solve more and more difficult problems. To be clear, this is a kind of emotional high that you'll have when you discover something.
There are all sorts of little moments like this, like: learning that you can rotate axis to simplify problems, learning how to break problems into component parts, learning how integral & differential calculus is how formulas are invented from their basic mathematical assumptions, understanding that portions of mathematics (like the natural exponent) are discovered rather than invented. All sorts of little things.
However, Leftist psuedo-science doesn't have any of this... so they invent it.
The acceptance of a contradictory statement becomes the Eureka moment for the midwits. They mistake being bamboozled for confusion, and acceptance for learning. The authority figure just signals to them that it's safe to accept the conclusion.
Like this:
SJW: "She has a penis."
Lowwit: "Ha! Good one. Boys have dics, not girls."
Midwit: "Ha ha ha! That's ridiculous".
Highwit: "You've use a contradiction in terms. I'm not taking you seriously."
SJW:Authority: "Actually..."Lowwit: "???"
Midwit: "???"
Highwit: "Oh god."
SJW:Authority: "... when you define women correctly, of course they can have penii."Midwit: "Ahhhh... I see."
Highwit: "What? No! You can't just re-define the terms of a premise in an argument!"
Lowwit: "You say that because you like dick, and hide your gay."
SJW:Authority: "Don't listen to them midwit! You're smarter than even highwit now! You are very smart."Midwit: "Yes! I am very smart."
Highwit: "You're both fucking stupid."
Lowwit: "Midwit tried this on me last week."
Where I think this all comes from is that the 'midwit' grouping is having their life experiences be dictated and controlled by authority figures. They are acting as slaves to an authority which is conditioning them, and giving them experiences through indoctrination, which is contradicting their normal life. The more they ingest corporate media, authority, and propaganda; the more the propaganda defines their lives, rather than their own experiences.
The Lowwits and Highwits are experiencing a different series of events because they are both not ingesting corporatist doctrine. The highwits because they recognize it, and the lowwits because corporatism doesn't benefit them. The lowwits basically live and learn from their experiences for better or worse. If they live in worse conditions, they learn worse lessons. Corporate conditions don't exist for them, and if they do, it's in an adversarial nature. The highwits are capable of recognizing the deception of corporatism, and reject it voluntarily.
What I'm saying is that the normies and midwits need to be stripped of their corporate protectionism, so that they can actually have experiences without the filter of corporate indoctrination and dogma which is supplanting their normal responses to stimuli, and giving them a completely twisted sense of knowledge.
Or, in a more lowwit manner: The boys have to learn.
The problem remains that we have way too many normies and midwits.
The real question is how can one remove normies and midwits away from globalist/corporate brainwashing?
We have to strip the cathedral at every level. Protectionism is the promise of the authoritarians running it.
So, a good first step is already happening: undermine that protectionist claim.
However, it can't be enough to just undermine it, but to completely subvert and poison the concept. "Look what they will do to you". We must eradicate trust in the institution. It's not enough for them to be skeptical of it, we need to promote the tearing of it apart.
This causes unease in those who are not prepared to protect themselves. So the second step is to push the heroic narrative on each individual to be able to protect themselves. Leadership not only through example, but inspiration as well. We must present them with an affirmative narrative where they can accept and believe that they will be better off governing themselves, then having others govern for them. We must promote a strong sense of individualism and individual attainment. Instead of "Don't raise taxes", say "keep your money". Instead of "cut government spending", say "they can't spend for you." Really push the idea of: only you know best for you.
Now that you have a strong individual, you need a strong community. Each person must be the pillar of their community, over-lapping with one another. New individuals must be able to join a community of people that will offer affiliates, that are anti-parallel to the establishment system.
We must have radical divestment from the establishment system wherever possible. We must exist in anti-parallel to them. We must be pushing the opposite direction.
I can't stress enough that it is imperative to re-individuate people. The establishment supports de-individuation in order to maintain collectivism and propagate emotional abuse & conditioning. Individuation must be a core focus of what we do and the rhetoric we use in order to separate people from the establishment system and make them anti-fragile. They have been given learned helplessness, and we must teach them strength. A heroic narrative is a critical aspect to that.
See, like this