It's not strawmanning to ask a question, and "secular" is glaringly conspicuous in it's inclusion alongside a criticism liberalism.
Complaining about 'non-theocratic liberalism' smells funny in the same way someone complaining about the flaws of 'non-communist socialism' sure sounds a lot like someone trying to warm the room up for some tankie bullshit.
My only point is that classical liberalism has failed because it has allowed for the woke to capitalize on the populace's empathy and tolerance.
I haven't proposed any other form of rule as the solution so why are you strawmanning here with theocracy and fascism?
I think that the wokeism problem is very difficult to solve.
All I am saying is that classical liberalism is what got us here to this current stage of wokeism.
It's not strawmanning to ask a question, and "secular" is glaringly conspicuous in it's inclusion alongside a criticism liberalism.
Complaining about 'non-theocratic liberalism' smells funny in the same way someone complaining about the flaws of 'non-communist socialism' sure sounds a lot like someone trying to warm the room up for some tankie bullshit.
The only point I am making is that classical liberalism has failed and has allowed wokeism to take over.
What is a good solution? I don't think there is any easy solution to any of this.
Feel free to ask questions. I always advocate for more critical thinking from everyone.