I obviously don't know how much of this is true if any but this four piece expose paints a very disturbing picture.
From what Byrne says it seems Giuliani was just going through the motions of trying to stop the steal.
WH counsel Cipollone apparently existed solely to say no to any potential effective action Trump could act to unveil the fraud.
According to Byrne, Trump was not served well by so many people including his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Personal Attorney Rudy Giuliani and WH Counsel Pat Cipollone.
We knew the courts were never going to fix this but Cipollone and Giuliani apparently sold Trump the idea that the courts were the only solution.
Just looking at things as an outsider, I'm not convinced everyone bought into the rhetoric they were trying to sell to everyone else. You try to tell people "if we let this fraud stand we don't have a country anymore" and then just abide by a bullshit court decision? Doesn't make any sense, and just makes you look weak.
If only Trump could have appointed those Burmese Generals...
I remember there being speculation that his early pardon was due to him being "useful" during that whole process; if true it's interesting that read was correct but just wan't the reason for the pardon. Almost makes you think Trump would have been better off appointing a bunch of Q followers as advisors.
Whatever else Q was, it was the most successful program ever devised to de-program Boomers from their ingrained notion that the government was comprised of well-meaning civil servants trapped by crushing bureaucracy.
Now a significant percentage think it's comprised of irredeemably evil pedos. That's necessary progress for what's coming.
I used to think that until I saw a bunch of Q boomers in the streets of Olympia beating the shit out of antifa.
I think the people running it wanted it to be complacency propaganda but like Trump himself took the rhetoric past the point where believers could reasonably be expected to be complacent.
not going to reveal gender of the incompetent
Of course.
Paid off by the matriarchy.
Ellis, Powell and Donna McDaniel were the people who betrayed Trump. They wanted the matriarchy. They were plants.
And there was a supermodel pretty 21-year-old acting as a senior assistant (at first I thought, “That’s not a good look on you, Rudy”, but it turned out she was extremely competent and professional, perhaps the most of anyone there)
God, listen to this fucking guy choke down every woman's non-existent dick. I can't believe anyone can take him seriously.
Over that weekend, Sidney sent a brilliant female junior attorney over to sit with me and a few of the dolphin-speakers (a name I use for the cyber-heads who enjoy geeking-out to each other in technical acronyms). That junior lawyer had anticipated staying 30 minutes, but after an hour and a half she went into the next room and called Sidney. I overheard her tell Sidney that we had the goods, or at least a well-developed understanding of what had gone on in various states, and even specific counties.
Guys, did I mention women tried to save us? Oh? I did? About 100 times?
One Pennsylvania lawyer, a female, had taken on the job of a filing in Pennsylvania. She received a message from opposing Kirkland & Ellis counsel that was so threatening, so unprofessional, that Kirkland later had to withdraw from the case
make that 101...
I have now read a fair few paragraphs and still not seen a single compliment towards a man for his efforts.
This guy is a braindead shill who took Soros bucks.
Seriously can't understand how a single person thinks he's credible. Listen to the way he talks about every single woman he encounters as perfect, it's so saccharine sweet that you can tell it's written by someone pro-matriarchy.
Powell was either a plant or literally insane. Ellis was the epitome of SCUM Manifesto tactics, pretending to be a true supporter when it was plainly obvious she wasn't, getting trusted enough to acquire the power position and begin the sabotage. As for McDaniel, she was a useless fuck going through the motions so that the voters were placated.
I'm not denying that there were men who betrayed Trump. I'm saying this article is a load of absolute bullshit to defend Sidney Powell.
Next election will be Harris against Haley, Haley will win.
This guy also writes very positively about General Flynn and not just Sidney Powell or other female lawyers.
I disagree with you discounting all of these articles merely because he said a few good things about a few female lawyers and staffers.
There are much better avenues that you could take to be skeptical of what Byrne says.
I think it is best to take anything anyone says with a grain of salt these days.
I didn't get that far, but all Q people love Flynn, so that's not really proof of anything.
That's not why, it's the fact that he constantly forces it down your throat - "women tried to save us" - over and over again. When someone is incompetent or useless, they aren't ever identified by gender. He even admits that. I can't think of a single reason for that other than to create a false narrative of female heroism.
I had a reason to be skeptical before that, he took Soros money. My personal belief is that the failure to stop Harris/Biden was the fault of Ellis, Powell, Lin Wood and Donna McDaniel.
I obviously don't know how much of this is true if any but this four piece expose paints a very disturbing picture.
From what Byrne says it seems Giuliani was just going through the motions of trying to stop the steal.
WH counsel Cipollone apparently existed solely to say no to any potential effective action Trump could act to unveil the fraud.
According to Byrne, Trump was not served well by so many people including his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Personal Attorney Rudy Giuliani and WH Counsel Pat Cipollone.
We knew the courts were never going to fix this but Cipollone and Giuliani apparently sold Trump the idea that the courts were the only solution.
Just looking at things as an outsider, I'm not convinced everyone bought into the rhetoric they were trying to sell to everyone else. You try to tell people "if we let this fraud stand we don't have a country anymore" and then just abide by a bullshit court decision? Doesn't make any sense, and just makes you look weak.
If only Trump could have appointed those Burmese Generals...
According to Byrne, if Trump had appointed General Flynn, things would have truly been quite different.
I remember there being speculation that his early pardon was due to him being "useful" during that whole process; if true it's interesting that read was correct but just wan't the reason for the pardon. Almost makes you think Trump would have been better off appointing a bunch of Q followers as advisors.
"Guys, everyone's a pedo right? Wait...that means one of us might be a pedo.." all start fighting each other
Whatever else Q was, it was the most successful program ever devised to de-program Boomers from their ingrained notion that the government was comprised of well-meaning civil servants trapped by crushing bureaucracy.
Now a significant percentage think it's comprised of irredeemably evil pedos. That's necessary progress for what's coming.
Q was complacency propaganda.
I used to think that until I saw a bunch of Q boomers in the streets of Olympia beating the shit out of antifa.
I think the people running it wanted it to be complacency propaganda but like Trump himself took the rhetoric past the point where believers could reasonably be expected to be complacent.
Dude I am not into Qanon but you really think they could ever be worse than the RNC sanctioned swamp infiltrators he was stuck with?
Honestly? Yes. And the sooner Taylor Greene fucks off, the better.
The choice wasn't between absolute retards and corrupt traitors. He should have chosen better.
Qanon is undoubtedly some shady group's psyop to keep people trusting a plan that doesn't exist.
I agree that Trump would have been best served by appointing competent populists instead of Qanon or crooked RNC plants.
However comparing q followers to RNC plants, it is obvious who was most effective in ruining Trump.
Didn't this guy get Soros bucks?
What the fuck?
Paid off by the matriarchy.
Ellis, Powell and Donna McDaniel were the people who betrayed Trump. They wanted the matriarchy. They were plants.
God, listen to this fucking guy choke down every woman's non-existent dick. I can't believe anyone can take him seriously.
Guys, did I mention women tried to save us? Oh? I did? About 100 times?
make that 101...
I have now read a fair few paragraphs and still not seen a single compliment towards a man for his efforts.
I've had enough now.
https://archive.is/deha6 - see how far you all can get.
Dude it wasn't just women who allegedly screwed Trump over.
Are Meadows, Cipollone and Giuliani women in your eyes?
Bro, it's TheImpossible1.
Do not engage.
He embodies everything wrong with feminism, just in the opposite direction.
I must have missed the part where I wrote a genocidal manifesto.
Get off my dick weirdo
Kek.
Much like feminists he also has retarded simps.
Ellis was literally exposed as not a Trump supporter.
This guy is a braindead shill who took Soros bucks. Seriously can't understand how a single person thinks he's credible. Listen to the way he talks about every single woman he encounters as perfect, it's so saccharine sweet that you can tell it's written by someone pro-matriarchy.
Powell was either a plant or literally insane. Ellis was the epitome of SCUM Manifesto tactics, pretending to be a true supporter when it was plainly obvious she wasn't, getting trusted enough to acquire the power position and begin the sabotage. As for McDaniel, she was a useless fuck going through the motions so that the voters were placated.
I'm not denying that there were men who betrayed Trump. I'm saying this article is a load of absolute bullshit to defend Sidney Powell.
Next election will be Harris against Haley, Haley will win.
This guy also writes very positively about General Flynn and not just Sidney Powell or other female lawyers. I disagree with you discounting all of these articles merely because he said a few good things about a few female lawyers and staffers. There are much better avenues that you could take to be skeptical of what Byrne says. I think it is best to take anything anyone says with a grain of salt these days.
I didn't get that far, but all Q people love Flynn, so that's not really proof of anything.
That's not why, it's the fact that he constantly forces it down your throat - "women tried to save us" - over and over again. When someone is incompetent or useless, they aren't ever identified by gender. He even admits that. I can't think of a single reason for that other than to create a false narrative of female heroism.
I had a reason to be skeptical before that, he took Soros money. My personal belief is that the failure to stop Harris/Biden was the fault of Ellis, Powell, Lin Wood and Donna McDaniel.