The same journal that went "HCQ doesn't work because Orange Man Bad" then went "Whoops, 100k deaths are on our hands because of that one, but we stand by our decision that Orange Man Bad!".
The same journal that went "I'm going to publish a study that is entire fabrications of pure fiction! Citing hospitals that don't exist, and others that aren't within the study's purview, and a SINGLE phone call would cause the entire study to fall apart! Publish it quick, before someone tries to verify LITERALLY ANYTHING about the study!"
Yeah, I'd trust it more if The National Enquirer published the results.
Here, let me help: I stand for reason, logic and common sense. Which is why I pointed out the absence of all three in the unhinged idiocy someone posted.
I don't think you're all stupid. Just people that post idiocy like that.
Uhuh. Do you even listen to yourself? You sound so condescending and pretentious.
It's not stupid. What's stupid is blindly accepting poison from people who have openly been stating their desire to kill us for the last 40 years.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but I'm not stupid enough to trust women to protect my toxic male self from harm. It'd be like being a Jew accepting injections from Nazi Party members.
Oh, it's being published in The Lancet...
The same journal that went "HCQ doesn't work because Orange Man Bad" then went "Whoops, 100k deaths are on our hands because of that one, but we stand by our decision that Orange Man Bad!".
The same journal that went "I'm going to publish a study that is entire fabrications of pure fiction! Citing hospitals that don't exist, and others that aren't within the study's purview, and a SINGLE phone call would cause the entire study to fall apart! Publish it quick, before someone tries to verify LITERALLY ANYTHING about the study!"
Yeah, I'd trust it more if The National Enquirer published the results.
Ah yes, Lancet. Their wonderful HQC study that was published by a research company that had 4 people. Not suspicious at all.
Nobody's buying your lies! We know the plan.
The male population must be reduced to 10% and power restored to women.
It's a paper. It's discussing a vaccine that was produced by a large team of people.
If you disagree with the paper, explain why. If you think it's flawed, articulate your reasons.
The gender of its authors is completely entirely and utterly fucking irrelevant.
Ah, this clown has returned.
It's far from irrelevant. Quit trying to push your genocidal plans, then maybe people will trust you.
The male population must be reduced to 10% and power restored to women.
You think we're all stupid, but some of us know what you all stand for.
Oh dear. You do not know what I stand for.
Here, let me help: I stand for reason, logic and common sense. Which is why I pointed out the absence of all three in the unhinged idiocy someone posted.
I don't think you're all stupid. Just people that post idiocy like that.
Uhuh. Do you even listen to yourself? You sound so condescending and pretentious.
It's not stupid. What's stupid is blindly accepting poison from people who have openly been stating their desire to kill us for the last 40 years.
I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but I'm not stupid enough to trust women to protect my toxic male self from harm. It'd be like being a Jew accepting injections from Nazi Party members.
I have to be condescending, it's the only way to get through to some people.
You know, the type that make weird silly comparisons between women and nazis.
It's only a silly comparison if you've been stuck under a rock since the 70s. As you're here and commenting on the internet, I'm guessing you are not.