I don't doubt you are correct for a vast majority, but saying its a flat 0.0% is more impossible than the feat you are calling impossible.
By using the word "statistically" I have to assume you have the data somewhere on this, and I'd like to see it because to reach such an incredible claim it certainly had easy flaws in its design.
I don't doubt you are correct for a vast majority, but saying its a flat 0.0% is more impossible than the feat you are calling impossible.
By using the word "statistically" I have to assume you have the data somewhere on this, and I'd like to see it because to reach such an incredible claim it certainly had easy flaws in its design.