https://archive.vn/UYWBV cnn. com
Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy
Tell us what happened
So this is how info is trickling out -- imperfectly and incompletely. Relying on lawmakers for read-outs of investigations is obviously problematic, as anyone who's ever played a game of Telephone knows. The authorities should be speaking directly to the press and the public.
You might be wondering about the news media's coverage of Trump's trip to Alamo, Texas on Tuesday. Ostensibly he is going there to celebrate the southern border wall. But there's a lot of concern about what he'll say and how he'll say it. Let me just reiterate what I said on CNN Monday morning: Responsible TV networks will not air Trump live and in full. Not after his incitement last week. But I think we'll see a repeat of last Wednesday's rally coverage, meaning that Fox and other pro-Trump networks will air Trump live, while other outlets will exercise editorial judgment and ingest what he says, then decide if any of it is newsworthy. Maybe Fox management will prove me wrong and skip the speech, we'll see...
Considering Trump saying anything is considered incitement anymore of course they won't show him. Then an hour later they will show Trump saying "no violence" with a headline that Trump calls for his cult to burn down the White House so Biden can't have it.
I wish he would, though.
CNN making the case for a fully nationalized news media under the Executive Branch.
Ministry of Truth is here boys. I'm getting flashbacks to Couomo saying it was illegal to read Wiki leaks.
Red journalism.
Well, it would defeat the purpose, wouldn't it? Airing Trump live and full robs them of the chance to claim he killed a bunch of puppies while talking.
I'm so glad that these people stand up for us stupid plebs and have the courage to decide what our feeble minds should hear, lest we make the wrong decisions.
Fucking assholes.
Stelter's bid to replace the apparatus of state with news announcements?