What is most sublimely idiotic about this is that, for millennia, different cultures have depicted Jesus in such a way as to be visually relatable to them. This you will have Him depicted as a Chinese sage, as an Ethiopian man, as an Egyptian, as a Russian etc. Christian art of Jesus has already depicted countless ethnicities. The fools who wrote this article couldn’t even begin to understand why what they propose is idiotic.
I actually had a discussion with my dad about this relating to all the racebending going on these days. There's nothing wrong with portraying Jesus differently to make him more relatable to other cultures, since he came to save everyone.
What is most sublimely idiotic about this is that, for millennia, different cultures have depicted Jesus in such a way as to be visually relatable to them. This you will have Him depicted as a Chinese sage, as an Ethiopian man, as an Egyptian, as a Russian etc. Christian art of Jesus has already depicted countless ethnicities. The fools who wrote this article couldn’t even begin to understand why what they propose is idiotic.
I actually had a discussion with my dad about this relating to all the racebending going on these days. There's nothing wrong with portraying Jesus differently to make him more relatable to other cultures, since he came to save everyone.
That's not what's going on here.