Do be careful about trusting some of these initial witness reports. I know Memeology 101 is putting out news footage of a witness statement saying he heard 3, then 5, then 10 gunshots.
A lot of people on 9/11 claimed that the first attack on the WTC tower were from "missiles" being fired into it. The initial report at the pentagon that the news was circulating was of a helicopter crash.
Or hell, I could just tell you about "Hands up, don't shoot"
Take a bit of a grain of salt with the witnesses. They have a nasty habit of back-rationalizing what they think they heard or saw to create a coherent narrative that they can better understand, rather than keeping to the specifics of what actually happened.
A gunfight related to the RV would seem highly unlikely. I'm also not totally convinced that the warning was designed to lure people to the RV. I'm not totally convinced of this countdown announcement either since we can hear the evacuation broadcast, but not the countdown.
They have a nasty habit of back-rationalizing what they think they heard or saw to create a coherent narrative that they can better understand, rather than keeping to the specifics of what actually happened.
I actually experienced this personally a few months ago. I witnessed a car crash when I was sitting at a red light. The only thing I was sure of was that a pickup t-boned a sedan (everyone ended up being okay), and when I glanced up at the light a few seconds later, my light was green. As little as 30 minutes later, I had constructed a whole narrative in my head of what had happened based on shit I couldn't have known at the time. Luckily, I caught myself.
It's a real problem with the human mind. It's not necessarily true that we're good at just pattern recognition. It's that our brain thinks in narratives, no matter what the facts are. We just have to put things in narratives, or they become very difficult to comprehend or understand. If we don't have evidence for a narrative, we start inserting things that sound like it makes sense, and then we see the narrative as fact.
Do be careful about trusting some of these initial witness reports. I know Memeology 101 is putting out news footage of a witness statement saying he heard 3, then 5, then 10 gunshots.
A lot of people on 9/11 claimed that the first attack on the WTC tower were from "missiles" being fired into it. The initial report at the pentagon that the news was circulating was of a helicopter crash.
Or hell, I could just tell you about "Hands up, don't shoot"
Take a bit of a grain of salt with the witnesses. They have a nasty habit of back-rationalizing what they think they heard or saw to create a coherent narrative that they can better understand, rather than keeping to the specifics of what actually happened.
A gunfight related to the RV would seem highly unlikely. I'm also not totally convinced that the warning was designed to lure people to the RV. I'm not totally convinced of this countdown announcement either since we can hear the evacuation broadcast, but not the countdown.
I actually experienced this personally a few months ago. I witnessed a car crash when I was sitting at a red light. The only thing I was sure of was that a pickup t-boned a sedan (everyone ended up being okay), and when I glanced up at the light a few seconds later, my light was green. As little as 30 minutes later, I had constructed a whole narrative in my head of what had happened based on shit I couldn't have known at the time. Luckily, I caught myself.
It's a real problem with the human mind. It's not necessarily true that we're good at just pattern recognition. It's that our brain thinks in narratives, no matter what the facts are. We just have to put things in narratives, or they become very difficult to comprehend or understand. If we don't have evidence for a narrative, we start inserting things that sound like it makes sense, and then we see the narrative as fact.
You kinda have to be trained to not do that.
Having been accused of this before, the Elders of Zion is a book, rather than people.