We are on the same page regarding the women (and men) who have hatred for anyone white or male.
What you haven't answered, and what I still do not understand, is how your claim that 45% of women are bad, if true, would justify hating the 55% who, it follows, are not bad.
Don't get me started on the traitors. Imagine siding with a mere theory over your own humanity. Even if they genuinely believe men leading is bad, they are allowed to hear discussions that would shock the world if they were disseminated openly. Look at Zuckerberg's tacit admission that banning hate speech against men would basically remove nearly all of the "equality" crusaders. They talk about us in a way that rivals how Hitler talked about Jews, yet their own allies who hear it all just enable them. How do they not realize that all men means all men?
Most discourse on social media is between the 45% and us. I don't see the reason to self-censor based on offending a group that plainly just isn't present. Nobody's going up to old women and saying "Fuck you for this!". The "misogynistic" discourse is either on containment platforms like here, where offence is expected, or on Twitter and Facebook, where it is absolutely dwarfed by hatred from women.
When that 55% is made up of the elderly and therefore doesn't know or doesn't care what's said on the internet.
Again, I hear the can being kicked.
What's going to be the action to take when the elderly die off and we are then left with the psychopaths?
Again, I don't see what your justification is for hating that 55%, when you are now saying that you think things will get worse when they die off.
If we don't wake people up to how much hatred young women have soon, we're fucked. That's the bottom line.
If we don't step up and counter it without violence, because violence will give their side justification, we'll lose every election.
We are on the same page regarding the women (and men) who have hatred for anyone white or male.
What you haven't answered, and what I still do not understand, is how your claim that 45% of women are bad, if true, would justify hating the 55% who, it follows, are not bad.
Don't get me started on the traitors. Imagine siding with a mere theory over your own humanity. Even if they genuinely believe men leading is bad, they are allowed to hear discussions that would shock the world if they were disseminated openly. Look at Zuckerberg's tacit admission that banning hate speech against men would basically remove nearly all of the "equality" crusaders. They talk about us in a way that rivals how Hitler talked about Jews, yet their own allies who hear it all just enable them. How do they not realize that all men means all men?
Most discourse on social media is between the 45% and us. I don't see the reason to self-censor based on offending a group that plainly just isn't present. Nobody's going up to old women and saying "Fuck you for this!". The "misogynistic" discourse is either on containment platforms like here, where offence is expected, or on Twitter and Facebook, where it is absolutely dwarfed by hatred from women.