Editing here is busted again, so I'll just make a second comment with my actual response.
First of all, a Muslim writing about poor treatment of Muslims is about as believable as a woman writing about misogyny.
Secondly, what does the sub-headline have to do with the actual article? There's nothing about the blatant propaganda that is pretending misogyny either exists or is a problem, it's all about the debate on race vs IQ.
Are Guardian readers so sexist that they have to be baited into reading articles with the promise of a "misogynist" getting torn apart? Yes.
Finally, who honestly cares what the Guardian thinks about race? It's a radical feminist paper that counts the likes of Jess Phillips MP among their writers. (I wonder if the same fraud that gets Biden elected in the US gets her elected.)
Editing here is busted again, so I'll just make a second comment with my actual response.
First of all, a Muslim writing about poor treatment of Muslims is about as believable as a woman writing about misogyny.
Secondly, what does the sub-headline have to do with the actual article? There's nothing about the blatant propaganda that is pretending misogyny either exists or is a problem, it's all about the debate on race vs IQ.
Are Guardian readers so sexist that they have to be baited into reading articles with the promise of a "misogynist" getting torn apart? Yes.
Finally, who honestly cares what the Guardian thinks about race? It's a radical feminist paper that counts the likes of Jess Phillips MP among their writers. (I wonder if the same fraud that gets Biden elected in the US gets her elected.)