There are states in which both parties of a conversation have to consent to taping. I have no idea how that applies to group calls, but I suspect it just means you want to make sure that you taped in a jurisdiction where only one party consent is required. Or, you know, don't get caught.
The calls were obviously recorded by CNN.
It's not a question of the legality of recording the calls at all.
The only question of legality here would have to be whether it was legal that someone at CNN leaked them to Project Veritas, or Project Veritas publishing them.
There are states in which both parties of a conversation have to consent to taping. I have no idea how that applies to group calls, but I suspect it just means you want to make sure that you taped in a jurisdiction where only one party consent is required. Or, you know, don't get caught.
The calls were obviously recorded by CNN.
It's not a question of the legality of recording the calls at all.
The only question of legality here would have to be whether it was legal that someone at CNN leaked them to Project Veritas, or Project Veritas publishing them.
I wouldn't say it's obvious that CNN recorded that call. My company has had calls with the CEO that weren't recorded.