Collective breaking point - I don't believe there is one. There won't be a "wow, they're evil" moment because of the "Good women" argument.
The easiest one is hiring, I would guess. With the whole success of BLM, I wonder if you'd get away with rejecting women for black men for every position that has to be filled by a woman.
We need to stop being slaves to our biology before it gets us killed by them.
Collective breaking point - I don't believe there is one. There won't be a "wow, they're evil" moment because of the "Good women" argument.
Collective breaking point is maybe to hard of a criterium. I think the critical mass is about 30 to 40% of men in a given society to check out.
The easiest one is hiring, I would guess. With the whole success of BLM, I wonder if you'd get away with rejecting women for black men for every position that has to be filled by a woman.
I still maintain that women are and will always be on the top of the progressive stack. Right now it may not look like it but when women really begin to suffer by [insert random intersectional cause here] they'll throw that cause under the bus without a sweat and everyone will go along with it.
We need to stop being slaves to our biology before it gets us killed by them.
Yeah, I won't bet on it. But I am positive that the age where the squeeze isn't worth the juice anymore gets lower for men each passing year.
That happened in Japan, so they got some puppet in after their last leader left. Unsurprisingly, mass immigration is the solution in his eyes, not protecting men's rights. I hate traitors.
I agree fully with that, it's blindingly obvious that every cause they take on is just to bring them closer to ultimate power. Everyone always brings up Islam, to which I have this response - A few women getting hurt is worth it to them if it brings them closer to removing our human rights.
I think Covid helped them a lot, forcing everyone to be away from their friends is very useful for trying to bring men back to the plantation.
Collective breaking point - I don't believe there is one. There won't be a "wow, they're evil" moment because of the "Good women" argument.
The easiest one is hiring, I would guess. With the whole success of BLM, I wonder if you'd get away with rejecting women for black men for every position that has to be filled by a woman.
We need to stop being slaves to our biology before it gets us killed by them.
Collective breaking point is maybe to hard of a criterium. I think the critical mass is about 30 to 40% of men in a given society to check out.
I still maintain that women are and will always be on the top of the progressive stack. Right now it may not look like it but when women really begin to suffer by [insert random intersectional cause here] they'll throw that cause under the bus without a sweat and everyone will go along with it.
Yeah, I won't bet on it. But I am positive that the age where the squeeze isn't worth the juice anymore gets lower for men each passing year.
That happened in Japan, so they got some puppet in after their last leader left. Unsurprisingly, mass immigration is the solution in his eyes, not protecting men's rights. I hate traitors.
I agree fully with that, it's blindingly obvious that every cause they take on is just to bring them closer to ultimate power. Everyone always brings up Islam, to which I have this response - A few women getting hurt is worth it to them if it brings them closer to removing our human rights.
I think Covid helped them a lot, forcing everyone to be away from their friends is very useful for trying to bring men back to the plantation.