They consider anti-fur groups to be "hate" groups because of redskin supremacists holding onto obsolete bullshit, worse than slavers. At least a slaver has an interest in keeping its beasts alive and healthy. Fur trade is useless obsolete nonsense holocaust-level evil.
I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.
They consider anti-fur groups to be "hate" groups because of redskin supremacists holding onto obsolete bullshit, worse than slavers. At least a slaver has an interest in keeping its beasts alive and healthy. Fur trade is useless obsolete nonsense holocaust-level evil.
Since when are anti-fur groups far-right though?
I assume the twisted logic would be something like "the left/"liberal" side is the the champion of minorities, which includes natives, so anything against natives is against the left, context be damned, and anything against the left is far-right."
Yes, actual pain and suffering go out the door as a concern because of hairy little niggers considered being considered automatically lower than little brown stone-age faggots because of genetic totem-poling.