As you no doubt remember, the far-left in California was attempting to reinstitute racial discrimination with Proposition 16. Billionaire oligarchs had contributed about 20 million to Proposition 16, whereas opponents raised barely 2 million (95% from Asians) from small contributors.
With 73% of votes reported, the election has been called for the opponents. They are leading with 56% of the vote, outrunning Trump's vote by 23 votes. This is harbinger of what you can expect what will happen if the electorate gets polarized on the lines of identity politics - even California could come in play.
Proposition 16 passed 60-14 in the California Assembly and 30-10 in the Senate. What kind of a political class is this, where you can get a supermajority for something that is overwhelmingly rejected by a majority non-white, very left-wing electorate? Who are they representing? The billionaire oligarchs who were trying to buy this election?
While I was looking into the props to inform myself, I found this convenient page with a summary of Prop 209 in 1996 + relevant data(Prop 16 passing would have repealed 209):
California Proposition 209, Affirmative Action Initiative (1996)
According to the site, Prop 209 banned "discrimination against/preferential treatment on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin". In other words, equality. It makes you think, you'd have to be some kind of racist to vote against this right?
With that in mind, take a look at the data table right under the election results. It shows L.A. exit poll data from a survey of ~2500 voters, with percentages of votes for/against Prop 209 according to each group of demographics.
Now, people vote with their own interests in mind(and they should), so it's interesting to see which demographic groups believed that they would benefit from equal treatment, and which demographic groups believed that equal treatment would be a detriment.
(I'll give you a hint, it's exactly what you'd think it'd be)