Hello fellow gamers,
We're the people who will be implementing the next chapter for OAG.
As many of you have noticed, there is a lot of controversy and concern about the site's future under new management. This, in part, is owed to how we went about announcing the next chapter of our journey together. For this, we apologize and are here to dispel any and all rumors going around as well as address any questions you our audience have for us.
We will show you with our action and our product's quality that we are serious about our mission and respect for you - the consumer. To begin this process, we are setting up an AMA to answer questions you have about the transition, staffing, what is going on, or who is best girl and why traps are most assuredly gay. Anything you are curious about, we will attempt to answer.
Ask us anything!
Proof: https://twitter.com/OneAngryGamerHD/status/1323646163317383169
We'll start answering your questions in 3 hours.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/u/OneAngryGamerHD/ ( Lead Editor ) https://kotakuinaction2.win/u/Kevin_Green/ ( Legacy Writer ) AKA Kevin : )
I won't be as blunt as some of the other people, but I will agree that this line from your announcement is very concerning.
What is the new ToS going to look like, especially as relates to hate speech? What is going to qualify as hate speech? And will your enforcement of hate speech be incredibly one-sided just like (virtually) every other single website out there which has adopted a hate speech ToS clause (see, for example, Twitter where saying "OK, dude" is misgendering and leads to a ban while saying "Muslims have a right to be angry and to kill millions of French people" is perfectly allowed)?
In order
It will be well defined and specific.
Hate Speech will utilize the European understanding of the concept. There will be no "from a position of power" modifier. Any derogatory or inciteful language will be banned. No calling people the N-word and no saying "kill all men."
All policies will be enforced equally.
Speech of that nature will not be permitted. There are no protected classes who have the right to kill anymore.
In my view, you're better off dumping the term entirely, and describing in an alternative way the things that you want to remove.
Agreed and this has been discussed and is under review. Owers and management get to make that decision.