Zuck has actually been on record as practically begging to be regulated. Regulations are in reality quiet good for massive corporations like Facebook. They can easily bear the brunt of either following them or being fined for NOT following them. Meanwhile, smaller competitors will be forced out because they can't afford to do the same. So for Zuck, more regulations just means preemptively screening out competition.
And then people wonder why the "market" produced this "monopoly", forcing us to facepalm and walk away because we haven't the time to have a 500 page discussion about regulatory capture.
Zuck has actually been on record as practically begging to be regulated. Regulations are in reality quiet good for massive corporations like Facebook. They can easily bear the brunt of either following them or being fined for NOT following them. Meanwhile, smaller competitors will be forced out because they can't afford to do the same. So for Zuck, more regulations just means preemptively screening out competition.
And then people wonder why the "market" produced this "monopoly", forcing us to facepalm and walk away because we haven't the time to have a 500 page discussion about regulatory capture.