I haven't seen anyone say to eliminate fossil by 2025, hundreds of millions (or more likely) billions of people would starve. Who is saying that who has any influence or where is it being taken seriously?
This seems to be a bit of confusion on my part, related to different environmental groups agendas and the fact that Biden misspoke.
The idea is mostly attempts at 'net-zero' carbon emissions by 2025 or 2035 depending on which group you're aiming for, and the end of fossil fuel use by 2050
The Green New Deal in it's current format proposes 100% of all Utilities from "Clean Energy" by 2030.
The Original Green New Deal pushed by the progressives in 2019 was for "Net-Zero" carbon emission "in 10 years", so probably 2029-2030.
Please don't say gold or BTC
Okay, Silver.
You really don't get much of a choice with inflation and a potential stock market collapse. Even ETFs aren't a very good idea. You have to invest in some asset that can preserve wealth. Precious metals are one, alternative currencies are another, land would work, but you said meager.
This seems to be a bit of confusion on my part, related to different environmental groups agendas and the fact that Biden misspoke.
The idea is mostly attempts at 'net-zero' carbon emissions by 2025 or 2035 depending on which group you're aiming for, and the end of fossil fuel use by 2050
The Green New Deal in it's current format proposes 100% of all Utilities from "Clean Energy" by 2030.
The Original Green New Deal pushed by the progressives in 2019 was for "Net-Zero" carbon emission "in 10 years", so probably 2029-2030.
Okay, Silver.
You really don't get much of a choice with inflation and a potential stock market collapse. Even ETFs aren't a very good idea. You have to invest in some asset that can preserve wealth. Precious metals are one, alternative currencies are another, land would work, but you said meager.