Minds has stated that lolicon is allowed on their site
(www.minds.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
What does loli art look like to you? Seriously. Because people made the same kind of "agreement" about hate speech. Now the reins to govern what hate speech is have been handed to the left. Citing FBI data and telling journalists to learn to code is now harassment. Sure, ban loli. Then anime in general gets banned. As long as you can marginalize the opposition, you can enforce a tyrannical "definition". Everything is now a power struggle to ban every opposing idea.
Loli is hot. Children are not.
All your arguments apply to Cuties but Cuties can at least argue (weakly) that its purpose is something other than the gross sexualization of children. Not hosting something is not the same as making its possession illegal. I don't want smoking in my restaurants or on planes I ride but I don't want smokers arrested.
Stop trying to pass off the sexualization of children as having any nobler aims beyond your own self-serving stimulation. It didn't pass the smell test with Cuties and it is far more obvious in this case. No one but your own kind believe you truly care about political free speech more than you do your loli porn.
Twitter, Facebook, and Google don't want conservatives arrested either. They just want to exclude their views from every platform. Payment processors, credit companies and banks don't want gun owners arrested. They just want firearms transactions off their platforms.
What's the smell test? You still can't answer this.
You seem very confused about this issue. I defend the right to post "hate speech" regarding men, women, majorities, and minorities. Do I also hate men, women, whites, blacks, asians, and everything in between?
The DIFFERENCE between loli and Cuties is that Cuties actually hurts real life kids . . So no the arguments are not the same.