Yours is deflection you literally said nothing but ad honinems

Not really. And you haven't said anything except ad honinems.

No. There's already a word for it called lolicon. As I said unless you can prove someone goes after actual kids you can't call them pedophile. The only reason people try to claim "pedophile" is to be inflamatory and disingenuous and muddy the waters to bring in actual kids.

Only to you cause you can't accept any other answer except the one you made up in your head.

How exactly.? First comment you didn't read or you dont understand or can't accept any other answer but "pedophile" and also can't understand burden is on you to begin with. .. And when are you gonna answer my question?

I didn't sidestep but you certainly are cause you can only accept one answer and trying to push burden of explanation on to others and sidestepping my question as well.

Cool the first thing I said answered you. But you are too stupid to understand or don't want to accept any other answer except one. And when are you going to answer my question to you? We know why you won't.

It's not for other people to explain fiction it's for you to explain why you treat it like a Karen treats violent video games in the 1980s . And you still haven't answered why you want to waste people's time and resources on going after loli instead of actual issues. We know why.

It's not evasion I answered you and you just don't want to accept any other answer except "pedophile" so why pretend to be open to debate? And the burden was on you to explain to begin with. Since when was it others burden to explain about fiction?

And you have evaded why you want to waste time and resources on going after Loli instead of actual issues. We know why.

Like I said the only thing anti lolis have is "YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE" and "ITS LITERALLY ACTUAL CHILDREN" and you still don't want to answer why you want to waste time and resources going after loli instead of dealing with real issues. We know why cause you want to distract from your own actual problems

Cool just admit you only want one answer which is to call others pedophile and won't accept any other answer why bother pretending you are open to any debate.

Nope. Unless you can prove they want to go after actual kids you cannot call someone pedophile. Lest you want to downplay the word to the point people don't know whether you are talking about people hurting actual kids or people who like anime..

I downvoted and I answered you

Do you think furries are zoophiles ? Or can a 1980's Karen ask why do you want to play violent video games? Or how adult women like to ship BakuDeku? It's asking the same sort of questions. And demanding people explain themselves over fiction or they are pedophiles is gross. The burden goes to you on why you want to keep acting as a Karen over loli and try to force insults on others and vilify others over it. And I do not like loli but I do not agree with the way people witchhunt it and I believe that it's just a way to distract from real issues and gives ground to the sjw left who use loli as a scapegoat to attack anime and call everything in anime as pedo.and just a gateway to increased censorship

And so your entire argument stems back to the same thing which is insulting and calling others pedo and "think of the ACTUAL CHILDREN " and seeing kids where there is none and we know why you want to downplay the word pedo and waste time going after Loli cause you want to hide your own real crimes.

And it was already explained the word to describe it is lolicon and using the word pedophile downplays the word and now you have made a situation of mixing up people hurting actual kids with people who like anime and you also make the stupid assumption that anyone who is against banning it likes it.and we know why you want to ban it cause you want to waste time and resources on going after it so people don't go after your own secret actual crimes.

No. You haven't explained anything except that you think it's pedophile. "think of the ACTUAL CHILDREN" and you are calling people pedophile ". Like what you are doing right now. And you haven't explained why you want to waste people's time and resources on going after Loli instead of dealing with real issues

Since when is it people's burden to explain fiction it's on the burden of the person attacking it. (and most anti lolis are just screaming threats and insults at people) And also explain why you want to waste people's time and resources going after it instead of dealing with any real issue.

As I said the burden lies on the people crying to ban and attack things to explain. Why all the other fictional things hmm ? Being a 1980s Karen demanding people explain themselves over fiction. And why do you want to attack it knowing you are wasting people's time and resources going after loli instead of real problems?

Yes "we know why". Loving the whole trying to accuse people of things because of fictional bases.and fiction is not something that is real and the burden lies on the person trying to ban and attack it to explain themselves. Same logic goes to furries, or 1980 video games and Karens getting angry over fiction like you are doing now. And why are you furries , are you a zoophile ?( A funny thing is how often furries end up outed as actual pedo) . And it goes back to the original topic of you guys having no rational argument except trying to label people as pedophiles.

That's important. I also think it's important for them to pay attention to who is foreign people investing in their stuff and foreign companies they are working with that want to subvert them.

"One poster". No it's more than that just a few minutes ago another says "lolifags should rope themselves"

The discussion from anti loli people is full of : "you're a pedo " "you should stay away from kids" "you're evil degenerates and should die" " you should be shipped off somewhere so you don't hurt kids " "it's literally cp and it's kids"

All just strawmanning and ad honinems and threats. Just irrational autistic angry screeching

Where's the child? And I find it interesting you want to insult and downplay the hurt of actual kids and say its the same as cartoons

Considering it seems people wanting to waste people's time and resources going after loli instead of actual pedo I'd say it's the opposite.

Im on the same boat I didn't even say I liked it but I defend it because I see it as a similar thing to the whole 1980's arguments against fiction (and it's basically just the trendy thing to attack right now) I also see it as giving ground to the left sjws who use loli as a scapegoat to attack anime( and actually they call everything in anime as pedo ). If you are not willing to defend something that you don't like or don't care for don't be surprised when they start censoring even more next on what you do like..