It’s time to debunk the “Nazi” epithet, and to show you where it came from, who invented it, and why. The fact is, that the term “Nazi” was created by the enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was a pejorative term; an insult or a slur. The Germans, not even Hitler nor any other top party officials ever called themselves “Nazis”! They called themselves “National Socialists” and nothing else. Those who can read German and have studied any of the original documents and speeches know this already, but most don’t.
Anyhow, you seem to think that your abbreviating national socialists using "NAZI," is not using a pejorative. Or did you intend to use the pejorative form of National Socialist?
Or all forms of "Nazi" are equal?
Asking for a friend
took about 2 seconds, you're welcome
Exposing the “Nazi” Epithet – Who started it, why, how, and who benefits
Red Pill 3rd Edition Removed (pg 223) https://archive.org/details/red-pill-3rd-edition-removed/page/223/mode/2up
It's hard to search for complete version of the "Red Pill 3rd Edition"
Ch8 "Hitler" is a good read. Has some good points on Poland and it's relation to Weimar Germany in Ch7.
BTW, you are using a term coined by the tribe...the correct historical term is National Socialists or NatSocs.
It is always good to watch some David Irving videos before the hopelessness of WWII being a good war against the bad Germans.
good point about Africa and that it is vastly abundant in easily procured food.
The reason that African's never had to make a 2 story structure, a religion, a written language, the wheel, a boat, etc is that Africa is so terrifically abundant in animal and plant stuffs.
They literally have no need for refrigeration or any modern analogue that we use in the North. Because Africa is crazy abundant with food.
Of course this changed when they became dependent upon "Aryan" manufacturing in Africa. But, that is a separate discussion.
Africa is a crazy technological analogue of iz-real's Abundance and the jews lack of advancement to gather a "real" homeland of Ukraine when they had it.
The jews may be more similar to africans than how they appear in that they both don't appear to have a authentically derived god...like the Norse, Greek, and Romans, etc.. that the god of the bible was contrived from the jews to be their god, henotheistic.
africans and the jews "chose" their god from many gods (which in the west and the incorrect bible scholars say is mono-theistic) when it is in fact heno-theism...sort of like the democrats calling America a "Democracy" when it's actually a "Republic"
Graham Hancock has a bible translator who says that they don't necessarily know what the word god is in the bible...and whether it is singular or plural. But, the usage in the bible is plural (Elohim) and not used in the singular (El)
anyhow, the jews had a hard time to make a natural god like the African's...
A problem with bringing up blacks is that they have pre-hominid ghost genes. They have ancestors in their DNA to an earlier ancestor than all the prior-hominid species.
The belong to a distinct hominid ancestor distinct from the other races.
This is so problematic as blacks belong to a different genera. Their correlation of genes to all the other races is as distant between wolves and coyotes if not more so.
Different species display different behaviors. Regardless whether they are IQs are the same or not... Accounting for different species displaying different behaviors is like the dog giving up his bed for the cat in the house.
It is like having cats and dogs in the same house...the cat doesn't seem to mind but the dog is without space.
Are you a member of the anti-fascists German terror group ...
Antifaschistische Aktion
Or do you speak against all nazi capitalism? socialism...?