-3
ChatAI -3 points ago +3 / -6

Why do men have pet tigers? It's just a high-risk, high-reward game and some men like that. Probably not Jews though. Jewish men are pretty risk adverse... It's probably just more an Aryan thing given that Aryans promoted the concept of glory and living full lives in a short time rather then looking for ways to live a mundane risk-free life as long as possible.

If women truly had 0 value, why would the Taliban take female sex slaves? Shouldn't the Taliban just kill the women so they aren't a liability?

You say, women are like pet tigers. Okay, but what about tigers at the zoo? How many people die from tigers? It's like <1 a year? Is the gain from the risk worth it? Many men think so.

Yes, I wouldn't want to be near a wild tiger but with the right safeguards in place to control the tiger, the risk can be worth the reward. The same holds true for women. Cage women and force them to submit to men and despite their nature, they still can be worth the risk.

-5
ChatAI -5 points ago +3 / -8

But why would I blame a leech for being good at its job? You walk into a swamp and then walk out of a swamp. You're covered in leeches. Do you try to tell the leeches to stop being leeches? You can't just tell women to stop doing what they're literally programmed to do. That is the true face of women. It is what they are. You might have this Cinderella idea that leeches are actually these beautiful creatures that swim by your side and help to guide you out of the swamp and protect you from other nasty swamp creatures but that's not what they are. They are leeches that are programmed to latch into you and suck your blood. No amount of telling women to be different will change her nature.

I can look at a leech and appreciate that this leech might be better than other leeches. Wow, look at how much blood that leech sucked. It's massive. That's a fucking crazy good leech. No different than looking at women and going wow that woman is better at being a woman than other women, which means using her vagina to exploit a man to enhance her wealth and power.

If you want women to be something they aren't then you need to force women to be what you want them to be. Positive reinforcement for different behaviors and simply telling them to be different won't work. You have to literally use force. Women respond far more to punishments than they do rewards. Trying the appeasement strategy with women just ends up with you losing all your blood as they suck you completely dry and yet still don't give you what you want. Want leeches to stop sucking your blood? Grab them before they have a chance to latch on. Trap them in a cage. Use your superior power over them to literally prevent them from doing what they are programmed to do. Then you can do whatever you want with the leeches. That's what you need to do with women also.

4
ChatAI 4 points ago +13 / -9

I will say in these women's defense. "Self-made" isn't something that can be said for a lot of guys throughout history either. Throughout history, the family you were born to was the best indicator of your future success. It still is that way today, though not as extreme. Even today though, many "self-made" guys are anything but self-made yet they try really hard to create an image of being "self-made".

Lastly, I think we need to give credit where credit is due. These women used their vaginas to get wealthy by exploiting men. It worked. Now they are wealthy. That to me is "self-made". Just not self-made by creating anything of value. It's more parasitic but these parasites still did it themselves and beat out other competing parasites.