It doesn't take long or much effort to realize that the statement above is true.

It also doesn't take long to realize it's a form of psychological conditioning that teaches people to literally condition themselves in to having a kind of paranoid obsession about Jews. If you look on Wikipedia, you see something Jewish, then you feel like your opinion is affirmed. If you look for anything Jewish, and you don't find it, then you ignore it and declare this to be the exception.

If you condition yourself to be suspicious of jews, then you will be suspicious of jews, because that's literally the point of the conditioning you just gave yourself.

TheImpossible1 does the same thing with women.

The current narrative that many in the anti-woke communities have unknowingly swallowed is that the woke, pro-diversity, anti-white movement is led by a bunch of self-hating, useful idiot, white people (more notably self-hating white women). But this is (largely) not the truth.

The truth is that the leaders and loudest proponents of anti-white sentiment are an outside group, the leaders of this movement are largely racist Jews.

The leaders of woke culture are never useful idiots, and plenty of them are European white, rather than white jews. Most of them are socialists for the purposes of control. The genuine leaders at investment banks are doing it as a methodology of political and economic control for their own personal interests, they couldn't give 2 shits about religion, race, culture, or anything else. They are securing their own money and power, and pretty much nothing else, no one else, matters a wit. Many of those people are white, but they don't care about being white. They care about being powerful. Yes, some of them are Jews, some of them are women, some of them are Chinese, none of them care about any of those things. They care about power. Their ideological means to power is Social Justice & Leftism because it concentrates their control.

When it comes to the "thought leaders" (the intellectual bourgeois), they come in all different forms, again, including white. This is because being a power-hungry sociopathic bio-lenninist failure doesn't exclude whites or jews.

These people are NOT white people. Although they may look white, they do not identify as white. They do not see themselves as "white" in the same way that many whose ancestors are from England, Russia, France, Italy, etc. do. They see themselves as Jewish, a completely separate ethnic/racial group.

Many of those ancestors don't see themselves as 'white' either because it's an American racial construct. German National Socialists didn't see themselves as 'white', they saw themselves as Volksdeutsche. The English saw themselves as English, and occasionally British, but not as "white". Neither did the Russian, French, or Italians.

You're also assuming that they don't see themselves as white Jews, mostly because you don't want them to see themselves as white Jews. You need them to see themselves as distinct so you can promote white distinctiveness for your own purposes.

The very act of them identifying themselves as white is them identifying themselves as white. You saying they're not actually white, doesn't take away from the fact that they are identifying themselves as white. You saying that they don't really identify themselves as white, doesn't change that they are literally identifying themselves as white.

You don't even bother to ask if they, themselves, are identifying as Jews, how they are doing that, how they even define who a Jew is, and if that is separate from their definitions and constructs about whiteness, and the implications from that.

These are, frankly, wonderful fault lines that any good anti-identitarian can exploit at all times, whether it's Black American identitarians claiming some sort of ownership over Africans, American Jewish Social Justice activists claiming affiliation with Israelis or the Orthodox rabbinate therein, or White Identitarians claiming some sort of right to dictate how Russian, German, French, or Italian ancestors identified themselves.

If you understood these fault lines, you could demand they prove their claim to their Jewishness along with their claim to whiteness, and watch them spin their fucking wheels. Particularly if they define whiteness by silly things like 'adhering to schedules' and 'individualism'.

"I'm white."

"Do you consider yourself an individual?"

"Yes."

"That's a white opinion."

"I'm a Jew... and I'm also white."

"Yes, I know, your opinions uphold white supremacy. Your whiteness surpasses your Judaism, so you are white. You are, at best, a white Jew. Or really, a little j white jew."

"That's racist."

"No, you're racist because of your whiteness. You are, by definition, morally degenerate compared to real Jews like the Orthodox Jews."

"REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

"Stop believing in individuality you fucking degenerate!"

In reality, yeah they are probably white people, even the Jews, even by Jewish standards regarding intermarriage & conversion, and by what most of /pol might describe as Amerimutt genetic admixtures. What you can't do, is tell other people to define these people as Jews, when they themselves might not be well defined by Jews, and while everyone is using different standards for what a Jew is. The reason you're doing that is because it has nothing to do with Jews, and everything to do with a white audience.