People defend games like they have equity in it now. Instead of criticizing bad action, they are okay with covering it up to make sure it sells and other people play. Only once it becomes undeniably obvious, then the shills have to back off. DOA6 is the classic example.
If they truly advocate for destroying a game and promoting censorship like that and try to say "its to get others to play", then treat those people like trojan horses and call them out for it, cause they probably are trojan horses.
You can tell who is honest and who are the subversives. Once the game flops, the honest ones will admit fault. The subversives will continue to say the censorship didn't go far enough, or remain silent as if they never tried to defend or push for censorship.
I managed to convert a few of the honest ones who had a stance of "fanservice isn't important, it's fine to remove it" into "stop removing fanservice, just leave it alone for the fans who enjoy it and continue to improve on gameplay".
People defend games like they have equity in it now. Instead of criticizing bad action, they are okay with covering it up to make sure it sells and other people play. Only once it becomes undeniably obvious, then the shills have to back off. DOA6 is the classic example.
If they truly advocate for destroying a game and promoting censorship like that and try to say "its to get others to play", then treat those people like trojan horses and call them out for it, cause they probably are trojan horses.
You can tell who is honest and who are the subversives. Once the game flops, the honest ones will admit fault. The subversives will continue to say the censorship didn't go far enough, or remain silent as if they never tried to defend or push for censorship.
I managed to convert a few of the honest ones who had a stance of "fanservice isn't important, it's fine to remove it" into "stop removing fanservice, just leave it alone for the fans who enjoy it and continue to improve on gameplay".