As the judge in the Pennsylvania court case pointed out, it started off as "flatten the curve", a reasonably well-defined goal that was enough to allow some of the restrictions legislated.
But that's gone now, replaced by this amorphous set of requirements to just do as you're damn well told, and that's not something the US constitution permits.
As the judge in the Pennsylvania court case pointed out, it started off as "flatten the curve", a reasonably well-defined goal that was enough to allow some of the restrictions legislated.
But that's gone now, replaced by this amorphous set of requirements to just do as you're damn well told, and that's not something the US constitution permits.