It's from the Weinsteins, its too little too late. Its essentially going back to ancient Roman leading by a council of two rather than three. A conservative and a liberal will run as President and Vice President, the next election they will then run for the other position as a ticket. Hence the name unity ticket.
The problem is, they haven't done the work to get the word out early on. They don't have actual candidates either who will take the risk and get sanctioned by their party. And then we have actual political violence going on against Trump supporters. So, no, no no no. I'm at the point now, where I'm taking no chance for Democrats getting their clutches on the white house. I don't want to invade Syria and I don't want to have four years of intersectionality. We had 8 years of Obama, and look at where we at now from him.
Twitter fuckery is sometimes malicious and sometimes just incompetence. Hard to tell which here. Unity2020 is pretty innocuous and not worth starting censorious shenanigans over. Wouldn't be surprised either way though.
It's also extremely dangerous for Dems considering so many people don't care about Biden. I've heard a lot of "I'm just voting for the cabinet" or "I'm just voting for the Supreme Court" or "He's my only option because I'll never vote for Trump".
It's in their interest to keep everyone divided and flinging poo at each other like monkeys so they'll be motivated to get out and vote for an extremely weak candidate.
Studies have also shown that outrage inducing content drastically increases social media engagement. Anything promoting the idea of "unity" isn't going to be much of a priority for Twitter to protect.
But it's not even targeted to Democrats or Republicans. It's just anti-establishment. Which is fine, except that it means both parties can agree to squash it.
whise the 3rd party? Isnt kayne west just a ploy to take black votes from the Democrats!
It's from the Weinsteins, its too little too late. Its essentially going back to ancient Roman leading by a council of two rather than three. A conservative and a liberal will run as President and Vice President, the next election they will then run for the other position as a ticket. Hence the name unity ticket.
The problem is, they haven't done the work to get the word out early on. They don't have actual candidates either who will take the risk and get sanctioned by their party. And then we have actual political violence going on against Trump supporters. So, no, no no no. I'm at the point now, where I'm taking no chance for Democrats getting their clutches on the white house. I don't want to invade Syria and I don't want to have four years of intersectionality. We had 8 years of Obama, and look at where we at now from him.
Twitter fuckery is sometimes malicious and sometimes just incompetence. Hard to tell which here. Unity2020 is pretty innocuous and not worth starting censorious shenanigans over. Wouldn't be surprised either way though.
It's also extremely dangerous for Dems considering so many people don't care about Biden. I've heard a lot of "I'm just voting for the cabinet" or "I'm just voting for the Supreme Court" or "He's my only option because I'll never vote for Trump".
It's in their interest to keep everyone divided and flinging poo at each other like monkeys so they'll be motivated to get out and vote for an extremely weak candidate.
Studies have also shown that outrage inducing content drastically increases social media engagement. Anything promoting the idea of "unity" isn't going to be much of a priority for Twitter to protect.
But it's not even targeted to Democrats or Republicans. It's just anti-establishment. Which is fine, except that it means both parties can agree to squash it.