I'm seriously considering getting it at or near launch (of course I'm willing to wait at least a little bit to hear if it works, is good, etc.) but not if it's going to be obnoxious and woke. I know they were at least talking about "heterosexuality not being the default" or whatever, which definitely isn't a good sign.
What have you guys heard?
The thing I want from CK3 is all of the features of CK2 with all the years of DLC. I want all of same world area. I want to play as all of the religions. I want retinues. I want disease, secret societies, merchant republics, etc... I don't want to but a sequel that has less features than the last game or to be sold the same DLC a second time. That is the big issue for me with CK3 with the woke stuff being the second. I hope its not too bad, but we know how willing they are to put progressive crap into anything.
It looks like they're keeping most of the stuff from CK2. It is almost like it is a reboot of CK2 that is more streamlined because towards the end it was a complicated mess. So I'm kind of curious where they are going to go with DLC.