im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
What consenting adults do in their private lives is no concern of mine. The pursuit of happiness is one of those universal things, after all.
But it wouldn't work for me, and I don't see it as a desirable arrangement more generally.
Private lives tend to become public lives, and public lives tend to become promoted lives. While I appreciate the liberty to pursue happiness, it has to be tempered with a socially accepted morality, or it becomes thinly veiled nihilism.